Predicting Head Injury Criterion in Real-World Frontal Impacts

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Research on modeling head injury metrics and head acceleration waveforms from real-world collisions has been limited compared to vehicle crash pulses. Prior studies have used rectangular, triangular, polynomial, half-sine, and haversine pulse functions to model vehicle crash pulses and have employed more complex approximations for head injury metrics. This study aimed to develop a method to predict 15 ms Head Injury Criterion (HIC<sub>15</sub>) in frontal passenger vehicle impacts using these simple pulse functions, where only occupant peak head acceleration and head impact duration are known. Vehicle crash tests from the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) were selected for frontal impacts that included driver occupants. Head acceleration and shoulder belt load channels of Hybrid III 50th percentile male anthropomorphic test devices were collected and separated for training a set of ratios and testing their performance. Rectangular, triangular, quadratic, half-sine, and haversine pulse functions were modeled using peak head acceleration and the duration of significant head acceleration from each ‘training’ NCAP crash test. Duration ratios were values calculated to scale each pulse function to predict the same HIC<sub>15</sub> as the driver’s experimental acceleration-time curve. Duration ratios were evaluated on each ‘testing’ NCAP crash test by comparing the HIC<sub>15</sub> predicted by each scaled pulse function against the driver’s HIC<sub>15</sub>. All five pulse functions generated from the model ‘training’ NCAP tests had significantly different duration ratios. There were no significant differences in predicted HIC<sub>15</sub> to the driver’s HIC<sub>15</sub> from the model ‘testing’ NCAP tests for all pulse functions. Findings indicate that applying the presented duration ratios to the five pulse functions can effectively predict HIC<sub>15</sub> in frontal crashes similar to NCAP tests, making them useful tools when only peak head acceleration and head impact duration are known. This work will help biomechanical safety experts evaluate head injury risk when real-time occupant kinematics are not available.</div></div>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8709
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Head Injury Criterion in Real-World Frontal Impacts

Sean D. Shimada, Kevin Adanty, Rachel L. Tanczos, Clyde Westrom
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

Predicting Head Injury Criterion in Real-World Frontal Impacts

Sean D. Shimada, Kevin Adanty, Rachel L. Tanczos, Clyde Westrom
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Research on modeling head injury metrics and head acceleration waveforms from real-world collisions has been limited compared to vehicle crash pulses. Prior studies have used rectangular, triangular, polynomial, half-sine, and haversine pulse functions to model vehicle crash pulses and have employed more complex approximations for head injury metrics. This study aimed to develop a method to predict 15 ms Head Injury Criterion (HIC<sub>15</sub>) in frontal passenger vehicle impacts using these simple pulse functions, where only occupant peak head acceleration and head impact duration are known. Vehicle crash tests from the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) were selected for frontal impacts that included driver occupants. Head acceleration and shoulder belt load channels of Hybrid III 50th percentile male anthropomorphic test devices were collected and separated for training a set of ratios and testing their performance. Rectangular, triangular, quadratic, half-sine, and haversine pulse functions were modeled using peak head acceleration and the duration of significant head acceleration from each ‘training’ NCAP crash test. Duration ratios were values calculated to scale each pulse function to predict the same HIC<sub>15</sub> as the driver’s experimental acceleration-time curve. Duration ratios were evaluated on each ‘testing’ NCAP crash test by comparing the HIC<sub>15</sub> predicted by each scaled pulse function against the driver’s HIC<sub>15</sub>. All five pulse functions generated from the model ‘training’ NCAP tests had significantly different duration ratios. There were no significant differences in predicted HIC<sub>15</sub> to the driver’s HIC<sub>15</sub> from the model ‘testing’ NCAP tests for all pulse functions. Findings indicate that applying the presented duration ratios to the five pulse functions can effectively predict HIC<sub>15</sub> in frontal crashes similar to NCAP tests, making them useful tools when only peak head acceleration and head impact duration are known. This work will help biomechanical safety experts evaluate head injury risk when real-time occupant kinematics are not available.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.