Neural Network Based Modeling and Model Predictive Control for Reduction in Diesel Emissions

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The paper illustrates the process and steps in the development of a neural network-based economic Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategy for reducing diesel engine feed gas emissions. This MPC controller performs fuel limiting and modifies intake manifold pressure and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rate set-points to the inner loop air path controller to reduce engine-out oxides of nitrogen (<i>NO<sub>x</sub></i>) and <i>Soot</i> emissions.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">We examine two Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) options for a control-oriented emissions model which are based on a multi-layer perception (MLP) architecture and a long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture. These RNN models are trained for use as prediction models in MPC. Both models are defined in input-output form, assuming that measurements/estimates of current values of <i>NO<sub>x</sub></i> and <i>Soot</i> are available. We discuss and compare their training using PyTorch.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The formulation of economic MPC is detailed, including the definition of the cost function and soft constraints. Approaches based on interior point methods and sequential quadratic programming for the numerical solution of the underlying optimization problem in MPC are summarized. Closed-loop simulations of the control system and the plant model in GT-Power demonstrate that both methods have the capability to shape engine-out emissions effectively by adjusting weights and constraints in the economic MPC formulation.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The solutions with MLP-based and LSTM-based RNN are then compared based on several aspects such as model complexity, training time, tuning, closed-loop performance, and execution time. The closed-loop performance in terms of cumulative <i>NO<sub>x</sub></i> and <i>Soot</i> exceeding soft constraints is compared based on Pareto fronts for the respective controller options. Methods to reduce online runtime are also studied. The results highlight the tradeoff between <i>NO<sub>x</sub></i> and <i>Soot</i> emissions, and that better open-loop prediction accuracy achieved with the LSTM Neural Network model compared to the MLP model does not necessarily translate into better closed-loop performance when used as a part of the MPC controller.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8369
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural Network Based Modeling and Model Predictive Control for Reduction in Diesel Emissions

Hayato Nakada, Ilya Kolmanovsky, Xiao Li, Jiadi Zhang et al.
1 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
1.21
article

Neural Network Based Modeling and Model Predictive Control for Reduction in Diesel Emissions

Hayato Nakada, Ilya Kolmanovsky, Xiao Li, Jiadi Zhang, M. Tsutsumi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The paper illustrates the process and steps in the development of a neural network-based economic Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategy for reducing diesel engine feed gas emissions. This MPC controller performs fuel limiting and modifies intake manifold pressure and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rate set-points to the inner loop air path controller to reduce engine-out oxides of nitrogen (<i>NO<sub>x</sub></i>) and <i>Soot</i> emissions.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">We examine two Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) options for a control-oriented emissions model which are based on a multi-layer perception (MLP) architecture and a long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture. These RNN models are trained for use as prediction models in MPC. Both models are defined in input-output form, assuming that measurements/estimates of current values of <i>NO<sub>x</sub></i> and <i>Soot</i> are available. We discuss and compare their training using PyTorch.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The formulation of economic MPC is detailed, including the definition of the cost function and soft constraints. Approaches based on interior point methods and sequential quadratic programming for the numerical solution of the underlying optimization problem in MPC are summarized. Closed-loop simulations of the control system and the plant model in GT-Power demonstrate that both methods have the capability to shape engine-out emissions effectively by adjusting weights and constraints in the economic MPC formulation.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The solutions with MLP-based and LSTM-based RNN are then compared based on several aspects such as model complexity, training time, tuning, closed-loop performance, and execution time. The closed-loop performance in terms of cumulative <i>NO<sub>x</sub></i> and <i>Soot</i> exceeding soft constraints is compared based on Pareto fronts for the respective controller options. Methods to reduce online runtime are also studied. The results highlight the tradeoff between <i>NO<sub>x</sub></i> and <i>Soot</i> emissions, and that better open-loop prediction accuracy achieved with the LSTM Neural Network model compared to the MLP model does not necessarily translate into better closed-loop performance when used as a part of the MPC controller.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
University of Michigan (US), General Motors (India) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.