The psychological impact of budgeting on financial decision-makers: Implications for comprehensive budget management systems

Budgeting is a fundamental tool in financial management, yet its psychological impact on financial decision-makers remains underexplored. This study investigates the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral effects of budgeting on individuals responsible for financial decisions in corporate and personal contexts. The research highlights how budgeting can induce stress, trigger cognitive biases such as anchoring and loss aversion, and influence emotional well-being, often leading to suboptimal decision-making. Using a mixed-methods approach, including surveys and interviews with financial managers and planners, the study identifies key psychological challenges in the budgeting process. Results reveal that stringent budgeting environments increase decision fatigue and stress levels, whereas user-centric and psychologically adaptive budgeting systems can mitigate these effects. Furthermore, incorporating behavioral finance principles into comprehensive budget management systems (CBMS) significantly improves decision-making efficiency, reduces emotional strain, and fosters a positive attitude toward financial planning. The findings underscore the need for integrating psychological considerations into CBMS design, such as stress reduction tools, cognitive bias alerts, and motivational feedback mechanisms. This approach not only supports financial decision-makers but also enhances overall financial management outcomes. Future research should explore long-term psychological adaptations to advanced budgeting tools and their role in promoting financial resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Social Psychology
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i3.3321
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The psychological impact of budgeting on financial decision-makers: Implications for comprehensive budget management systems

H. S. Zhang
1 citations
Environment and Social Psychology
Accounting and Organizational Management
2.28
article

The psychological impact of budgeting on financial decision-makers: Implications for comprehensive budget management systems

H. S. Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Budgeting is a fundamental tool in financial management, yet its psychological impact on financial decision-makers remains underexplored. This study investigates the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral effects of budgeting on individuals responsible for financial decisions in corporate and personal contexts. The research highlights how budgeting can induce stress, trigger cognitive biases such as anchoring and loss aversion, and influence emotional well-being, often leading to suboptimal decision-making. Using a mixed-methods approach, including surveys and interviews with financial managers and planners, the study identifies key psychological challenges in the budgeting process. Results reveal that stringent budgeting environments increase decision fatigue and stress levels, whereas user-centric and psychologically adaptive budgeting systems can mitigate these effects. Furthermore, incorporating behavioral finance principles into comprehensive budget management systems (CBMS) significantly improves decision-making efficiency, reduces emotional strain, and fosters a positive attitude toward financial planning. The findings underscore the need for integrating psychological considerations into CBMS design, such as stress reduction tools, cognitive bias alerts, and motivational feedback mechanisms. This approach not only supports financial decision-makers but also enhances overall financial management outcomes. Future research should explore long-term psychological adaptations to advanced budgeting tools and their role in promoting financial resilience.

Environment and Social PsychologyVol. 10(3)
City University of Macau (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Accounting and Organizational Management
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The psychological impact of budgeting on financial decision-makers: Implications for comprehensive budget management systems — H. S. Zhang · Environment and Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS