AI Models for Wildlife Population Dynamics: Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning

AI-driven solutions have been involved in the development of ecosystem population models and have shown unprecedented growth in applying these capabilities to the field of conservation sciences. This research article does a systematic comparative analysis of species distribution modeling, population prediction, and wildlife monitoring using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods. ML techniques such as Random Forests and Support Vector Machines are the main tools of ML, as they give rise to a high degree of interpretability and computational efficiency, especially within modest data contexts. On the other hand, deep learning techniques, e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), are more useful in image-based population counting and temporal pattern analysis, although they require large data and computational resources. This paper tries to evaluate model performance in terms of the main metrics like prediction accuracy, F1 scores, and computational efficiency, so by doing this, we will be able to see the trade-offs of the two methods. Further, the concerns about data quality, model validation, and spatial distribution within the conservation frameworks are tackled. We cope with such challenges by introducing new mechanisms like multi-modal data fusion, edge computing, and federated learning. The main message that can be drawn from the data is that hybrid AI models, uniform data frameworks, and mixed disciplinary methods are the most successful ways to conserve wildlife. In addition, it can benefit scientists and practitioners in the verification of AIs appropriated for ecological challenges by offering new points as well. The cure-all for this would be to come up with more practical conservation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of basic and applied research international
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56557/jobari/2025/v31i39213
Primary Topic
Data Analysis with R
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Models for Wildlife Population Dynamics: Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning

Vishal Shah
Journal of basic and applied research international
Data Analysis with R
article

AI Models for Wildlife Population Dynamics: Machine Learning vs. Deep Learning

Vishal Shah
article en

Abstract

AI-driven solutions have been involved in the development of ecosystem population models and have shown unprecedented growth in applying these capabilities to the field of conservation sciences. This research article does a systematic comparative analysis of species distribution modeling, population prediction, and wildlife monitoring using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods. ML techniques such as Random Forests and Support Vector Machines are the main tools of ML, as they give rise to a high degree of interpretability and computational efficiency, especially within modest data contexts. On the other hand, deep learning techniques, e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), are more useful in image-based population counting and temporal pattern analysis, although they require large data and computational resources. This paper tries to evaluate model performance in terms of the main metrics like prediction accuracy, F1 scores, and computational efficiency, so by doing this, we will be able to see the trade-offs of the two methods. Further, the concerns about data quality, model validation, and spatial distribution within the conservation frameworks are tackled. We cope with such challenges by introducing new mechanisms like multi-modal data fusion, edge computing, and federated learning. The main message that can be drawn from the data is that hybrid AI models, uniform data frameworks, and mixed disciplinary methods are the most successful ways to conserve wildlife. In addition, it can benefit scientists and practitioners in the verification of AIs appropriated for ecological challenges by offering new points as well. The cure-all for this would be to come up with more practical conservation strategies.

Journal of basic and applied research internationalVol. 31(3)
New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Data Analysis with R
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.