Low uptake of driver refresher courses by older adults: An examination of potential explanatory variables using the Candrive cohort

Older drivers benefit from driver refresher courses, particularly courses with on-road training. Yet, the uptake of these courses and the factors associated with taking them is poorly documented. We used data from the Candrive prospective cohort (N = 928) to examine these issues using variables representing sociodemographic factors (e.g., age), health-related factors (e.g., medical conditions), and driving-related factors (e.g., driving comfort). The outcome variable was operationalized as having taken a non-mandatory refresher course in the last 10 years or never. Participants’ mean age was 76.21 (SD = 4.85) and 576 (62.1 %) were males. Ninety-eight participants (10.6 %) reported having taken a non-mandatory refresher course within the last 10 years, and less than half of those reported that it included an on-road component. Only nine percent of participants had discussed driving with a physician. The multivariable regression model (N = 746; −2 log likelihood = 515.10, p < .001, Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.12) identified five variables as statistically significant. The odds of having taken a course were higher with age (OR = 1.53, 95 % CI = 1.23, 1.92), when one’s driving was perceived as important for others (OR = 1.87, 95 % CI = 1.26, 2.80), and for participants who spoke to their family (OR = 1.80, 95 % CI = 1.04, 3.09) or to a physician about driving (OR = 2.24, 95 % CI = 1.15, 4.36); the odds were lower for those who benefited the most personally from driving (OR = 0.64, 95 % CI = 0.51, 0.82). The uptake of driver refresher courses is low and few discussions about driving took place with physicians. Further research is needed to understand the barriers and facilitators related to older drivers’ involvement in refresher courses. • Among a sample of Canadian older drivers, less than 30 % reported having ever taken a non-mandatory refresher course. • Age and the importance of driving are associated with the odds of having taken a refresher course. • Few drivers discussed driving with family/physicians, but these discussions are associated with taking a refresher course.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport & Health
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2025.102043
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low uptake of driver refresher courses by older adults: An examination of potential explanatory variables using the Candrive cohort

Hillary Maxwell, Brenda Vrkljan, Shawn Marshall, Barbara Mazer et al.
1 citations
Journal of Transport & Health
Older Adults Driving Studies
4.76
article

Low uptake of driver refresher courses by older adults: An examination of potential explanatory variables using the Candrive cohort

Hillary Maxwell, Brenda Vrkljan, Shawn Marshall, Barbara Mazer, Isabelle Gélinas, Gary Naglie, Mark Jeffrey Rapoport, Holly Tuokko, Michel Bédard, Michelle M. Porter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Older drivers benefit from driver refresher courses, particularly courses with on-road training. Yet, the uptake of these courses and the factors associated with taking them is poorly documented. We used data from the Candrive prospective cohort (N = 928) to examine these issues using variables representing sociodemographic factors (e.g., age), health-related factors (e.g., medical conditions), and driving-related factors (e.g., driving comfort). The outcome variable was operationalized as having taken a non-mandatory refresher course in the last 10 years or never. Participants’ mean age was 76.21 (SD = 4.85) and 576 (62.1 %) were males. Ninety-eight participants (10.6 %) reported having taken a non-mandatory refresher course within the last 10 years, and less than half of those reported that it included an on-road component. Only nine percent of participants had discussed driving with a physician. The multivariable regression model (N = 746; −2 log likelihood = 515.10, p < .001, Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.12) identified five variables as statistically significant. The odds of having taken a course were higher with age (OR = 1.53, 95 % CI = 1.23, 1.92), when one’s driving was perceived as important for others (OR = 1.87, 95 % CI = 1.26, 2.80), and for participants who spoke to their family (OR = 1.80, 95 % CI = 1.04, 3.09) or to a physician about driving (OR = 2.24, 95 % CI = 1.15, 4.36); the odds were lower for those who benefited the most personally from driving (OR = 0.64, 95 % CI = 0.51, 0.82). The uptake of driver refresher courses is low and few discussions about driving took place with physicians. Further research is needed to understand the barriers and facilitators related to older drivers’ involvement in refresher courses. • Among a sample of Canadian older drivers, less than 30 % reported having ever taken a non-mandatory refresher course. • Age and the importance of driving are associated with the odds of having taken a refresher course. • Few drivers discussed driving with family/physicians, but these discussions are associated with taking a refresher course.

Journal of Transport & HealthVol. 42
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), University of Victoria (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Baycrest Hospital (CA), Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CA), St. Joseph's Care Group (CA), Bruyère (CA), University of Manitoba (CA), Lakehead University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
University of Toronto, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Older Adults Driving Studies
4.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.