Deriving Architectural Requirements for SAE J3016<sup>TM</sup> Level 3 System from Functional Safety Perspective

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Vehicles with SAE J3016TM Level 3 systems are exposed to road infrastructure, Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs), traffic and other actors on roadways. Hence safe deployment of Level 3 systems is of paramount importance. One aspect of safe deployment of SAE Level 3 systems is the application of functional safety (ISO 26262) to their design, development, integration, and testing. This ensures freedom from unreasonable risk, in the event of a system failure and sufficient provisions to maintain Dynamic Driving Task (DDT) and to initiate Minimum Risk Maneuver (MRM), in the presence of random hardware and systematic failures. This paper explores leveraging ISO 26262 standard to develop architectural requirements for enabling SAE Level 3 systems to maintain DDT and MRM during fault conditions and outlines the importance of fail-operability for Level 3 systems, from a functional safety perspective. At a high-level, UN Regulation No. 157 – Automated Lane Keeping Systems (ALKS) is used as a baseline for deriving safety goals for SAE Level 3 systems, to ensure that the operation of Level 3 systems with failure conditions are free from unreasonable risk. This paper discusses the process by which these safety goals are manifested into architectural requirements for safely deploying SAE Level 3 systems. It highlights how fail -operability is a necessary characteristic to sustain DDT to tolerate safety-critical failures (single point, plausible dual point, or common cause failures) and to initiate MRM to bring the vehicle to a safe state or until the driver takes over.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8009
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deriving Architectural Requirements for SAE J3016TM Level 3 System from Functional Safety Perspective

Venkateswara Raju Mudunuri, Namitha Jayakumar
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Deriving Architectural Requirements for SAE J3016TM Level 3 System from Functional Safety Perspective

Venkateswara Raju Mudunuri, Namitha Jayakumar
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Vehicles with SAE J3016TM Level 3 systems are exposed to road infrastructure, Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs), traffic and other actors on roadways. Hence safe deployment of Level 3 systems is of paramount importance. One aspect of safe deployment of SAE Level 3 systems is the application of functional safety (ISO 26262) to their design, development, integration, and testing. This ensures freedom from unreasonable risk, in the event of a system failure and sufficient provisions to maintain Dynamic Driving Task (DDT) and to initiate Minimum Risk Maneuver (MRM), in the presence of random hardware and systematic failures. This paper explores leveraging ISO 26262 standard to develop architectural requirements for enabling SAE Level 3 systems to maintain DDT and MRM during fault conditions and outlines the importance of fail-operability for Level 3 systems, from a functional safety perspective. At a high-level, UN Regulation No. 157 – Automated Lane Keeping Systems (ALKS) is used as a baseline for deriving safety goals for SAE Level 3 systems, to ensure that the operation of Level 3 systems with failure conditions are free from unreasonable risk. This paper discusses the process by which these safety goals are manifested into architectural requirements for safely deploying SAE Level 3 systems. It highlights how fail -operability is a necessary characteristic to sustain DDT to tolerate safety-critical failures (single point, plausible dual point, or common cause failures) and to initiate MRM to bring the vehicle to a safe state or until the driver takes over.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
General Motors (Poland) (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deriving Architectural Requirements for SAE J3016<sup>TM</sup> Level 3 System from Functional Safety Perspective — Venkateswara Raju Mudunuri, Namitha Jayakumar · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS