Accuracy of Timestamps in Digital and Network Video Recorders

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Video analysis plays a major role in many forensic fields. Many articles, publications, and presentations have covered the importance and difficulty in properly establishing frame timing. In many cases, the analyst is given video files that do not contain native metadata. In other cases, the files contain video recordings of the surveillance playback monitor which eliminates all original metadata from the video recording. These “video of video” recordings prevent an analyst from determining frame timing using metadata from the original file. However, within many of these video files, timestamp information is visually imprinted onto each frame. Analyses that rely on timing of events captured in video may benefit from these imprinted timestamps, but for forensic purposes, it is important to establish the accuracy and reliability of these timestamps. The purpose of this research is to examine the accuracy of these timestamps and to establish if they can be used to determine the timing between frames. Four recording devices and six cameras were utilized with varying configurations. All videos recorded the Axon VFR Lightboard as the control measurement. Videos were recorded with each device and each camera configuration at 30, 15, and 4 frames per second. Once recorded, each video was processed using Axon Investigate’s “VFR Lightboard Calculator” to establish the actual timing between each frame. Subsequently, ten timestamp seconds within each video were compared to the actual elapsed time reported by the Lightboard. In total, 54 videos were recorded across all configurations. This study demonstrates the timestamp is not always accurate from second to second. However, a pattern was observed, and a methodology was developed. The average error between the theoretical time and the actual time reported by the Lightboard was 2.99 milliseconds (approximately 0.3%). The maximum error between theoretical and actual time for any timestamp second was 22 milliseconds (approximately 2.2%).</div></div>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8690
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Timestamps in Digital and Network Video Recorders

Benjamin T. Molnar, Tilo Voitel, Toby Terpstra
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Accuracy of Timestamps in Digital and Network Video Recorders

Benjamin T. Molnar, Tilo Voitel, Toby Terpstra
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Video analysis plays a major role in many forensic fields. Many articles, publications, and presentations have covered the importance and difficulty in properly establishing frame timing. In many cases, the analyst is given video files that do not contain native metadata. In other cases, the files contain video recordings of the surveillance playback monitor which eliminates all original metadata from the video recording. These “video of video” recordings prevent an analyst from determining frame timing using metadata from the original file. However, within many of these video files, timestamp information is visually imprinted onto each frame. Analyses that rely on timing of events captured in video may benefit from these imprinted timestamps, but for forensic purposes, it is important to establish the accuracy and reliability of these timestamps. The purpose of this research is to examine the accuracy of these timestamps and to establish if they can be used to determine the timing between frames. Four recording devices and six cameras were utilized with varying configurations. All videos recorded the Axon VFR Lightboard as the control measurement. Videos were recorded with each device and each camera configuration at 30, 15, and 4 frames per second. Once recorded, each video was processed using Axon Investigate’s “VFR Lightboard Calculator” to establish the actual timing between each frame. Subsequently, ten timestamp seconds within each video were compared to the actual elapsed time reported by the Lightboard. In total, 54 videos were recorded across all configurations. This study demonstrates the timestamp is not always accurate from second to second. However, a pattern was observed, and a methodology was developed. The average error between the theoretical time and the actual time reported by the Lightboard was 2.99 milliseconds (approximately 0.3%). The maximum error between theoretical and actual time for any timestamp second was 22 milliseconds (approximately 2.2%).</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.