Keeping the human in the loop: are autonomous decisions inevitable?

Abstract Control rooms play a crucial role in monitoring and managing safety-critical systems, such as power grids, emergency response, and transportation networks. As these systems become increasingly complex and generate more data, the role of human operators is evolving amid growing reliance on automation and autonomous decision-making. This paper explores the balance between leveraging automation for efficiency and preserving human intuition and ethical judgment, particularly in high-stakes scenarios. Through an analysis of control room trends, operator attitudes, and models of human-computer collaboration, this paper highlights the benefits and challenges of automation, including risks of deskilling, automation bias, and accountability. The paper advocates for a hybrid approach of collaborative autonomy, where humans and systems work in partnership to ensure transparency, trust, and adaptability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
i-com
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0068
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keeping the human in the loop: are autonomous decisions inevitable?

Kristof Van Laerhoven, Jonas Pöhler, Nadine Flegel, Tilo Mentler
5 citations
i-com
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
12.19
article

Keeping the human in the loop: are autonomous decisions inevitable?

Kristof Van Laerhoven, Jonas Pöhler, Nadine Flegel, Tilo Mentler
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Control rooms play a crucial role in monitoring and managing safety-critical systems, such as power grids, emergency response, and transportation networks. As these systems become increasingly complex and generate more data, the role of human operators is evolving amid growing reliance on automation and autonomous decision-making. This paper explores the balance between leveraging automation for efficiency and preserving human intuition and ethical judgment, particularly in high-stakes scenarios. Through an analysis of control room trends, operator attitudes, and models of human-computer collaboration, this paper highlights the benefits and challenges of automation, including risks of deskilling, automation bias, and accountability. The paper advocates for a hybrid approach of collaborative autonomy, where humans and systems work in partnership to ensure transparency, trust, and adaptability.

i-comVol. 24(1)
Trier University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Siegen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
12.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.