Decarbonization of Off-Road Engines by Methanol Mixing-Controlled Compression Ignition with Ignition Enhancer

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Methanol is one of the most promising fuels for the decarbonization of the off-road and transportation sectors. Although methanol is typically considered an alternative fuel for spark ignition engines, mixing-controlled compression ignition (MCCI) combustion is typically preferred in most off-road and medium-and heavy-duty applications due to its high reliability, durability and high-efficiency. In this paper, methanol MCCI combustion was enabled using ignition improvers and the potential benefits of this approach compared to conventional diesel combustion were investigated.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Methanol was blended with 7%<sub>vol</sub> of 2-ethylhexyl nitrate (EHN) and experiments were performed in a single-cylinder production-like diesel engine with a displacement volume of 0.8315 L and a compression ratio of 16.5:1. The conditions of the ISO 8178 C1 regulatory cycle for off-road engines were tested, and performance and emissions over the cycle were calculated. Methanol MCCI shows 5.3% lower fuel consumption (in gallons of diesel equivalent) than conventional diesel combustion, resulting in a 20% reduction in operation costs. Smoke emissions are also very low, 97% lower than those of conventional diesel over the cycle, and a diesel particulate filter will not be required with methanol. CO emissions are higher than those of diesel and slightly higher than the legal limit, so an oxidation catalyst will be required with methanol. However, low load operation at rated speed accounts for 44.2% of the total CO emissions over the regulatory cycle, so optimization of this operating point is key to reduce CO and simplify the required aftertreatment. NOx emissions are higher than the legal limit for both methanol and diesel, so both technologies will require NOx aftertreatment, such as a selective catalyst reduction catalyst. In conclusion, the ultra-low soot, lower fuel consumption, lower operating cost, and retrofit potential of methanol MCCI indicate that this is a promising approach for decarbonization of the off-road sector.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8411
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decarbonization of Off-Road Engines by Methanol Mixing-Controlled Compression Ignition with Ignition Enhancer

James MacDonald, Darío López Pintor, Abhinandhan Narayanan, Adrian D. C. Chan et al.
2 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
1.44
article

Decarbonization of Off-Road Engines by Methanol Mixing-Controlled Compression Ignition with Ignition Enhancer

James MacDonald, Darío López Pintor, Abhinandhan Narayanan, Adrian D. C. Chan, Sanguk Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Methanol is one of the most promising fuels for the decarbonization of the off-road and transportation sectors. Although methanol is typically considered an alternative fuel for spark ignition engines, mixing-controlled compression ignition (MCCI) combustion is typically preferred in most off-road and medium-and heavy-duty applications due to its high reliability, durability and high-efficiency. In this paper, methanol MCCI combustion was enabled using ignition improvers and the potential benefits of this approach compared to conventional diesel combustion were investigated.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Methanol was blended with 7%<sub>vol</sub> of 2-ethylhexyl nitrate (EHN) and experiments were performed in a single-cylinder production-like diesel engine with a displacement volume of 0.8315 L and a compression ratio of 16.5:1. The conditions of the ISO 8178 C1 regulatory cycle for off-road engines were tested, and performance and emissions over the cycle were calculated. Methanol MCCI shows 5.3% lower fuel consumption (in gallons of diesel equivalent) than conventional diesel combustion, resulting in a 20% reduction in operation costs. Smoke emissions are also very low, 97% lower than those of conventional diesel over the cycle, and a diesel particulate filter will not be required with methanol. CO emissions are higher than those of diesel and slightly higher than the legal limit, so an oxidation catalyst will be required with methanol. However, low load operation at rated speed accounts for 44.2% of the total CO emissions over the regulatory cycle, so optimization of this operating point is key to reduce CO and simplify the required aftertreatment. NOx emissions are higher than the legal limit for both methanol and diesel, so both technologies will require NOx aftertreatment, such as a selective catalyst reduction catalyst. In conclusion, the ultra-low soot, lower fuel consumption, lower operating cost, and retrofit potential of methanol MCCI indicate that this is a promising approach for decarbonization of the off-road sector.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
1.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.