Immanuel Kant’s Anthropology and Ernest Gellner’s Critique of the Modern Social Sciences

I examine the profound influence of Immanuel Kant’s philosophical anthropology on Ernest Gellner’s social theory. Exploring how Kant’s attempt to preserve human agency in the face of mechanical explanations of nature shaped Gellner’s approach to the social sciences, I trace certain key concepts from Kant through to Gellner, including the “exception,” disenchantment, and mechanical dehumanization. I analyze Gellner’s expansion of the Kantian critique, in particular his historicization of Kant’s universal claims and his concept of the “Rubber Cage.” The essay concludes by considering the ongoing relevance of this Kantian-Gellnerian perspective for the contemporary social sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931251327325
Citations
1
Primary Topic
German Social Sciences and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immanuel Kant’s Anthropology and Ernest Gellner’s Critique of the Modern Social Sciences

Roey Reichert
1 citations
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
German Social Sciences and History
4.20
article

Immanuel Kant’s Anthropology and Ernest Gellner’s Critique of the Modern Social Sciences

Roey Reichert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

I examine the profound influence of Immanuel Kant’s philosophical anthropology on Ernest Gellner’s social theory. Exploring how Kant’s attempt to preserve human agency in the face of mechanical explanations of nature shaped Gellner’s approach to the social sciences, I trace certain key concepts from Kant through to Gellner, including the “exception,” disenchantment, and mechanical dehumanization. I analyze Gellner’s expansion of the Kantian critique, in particular his historicization of Kant’s universal claims and his concept of the “Rubber Cage.” The essay concludes by considering the ongoing relevance of this Kantian-Gellnerian perspective for the contemporary social sciences.

Philosophy of the Social SciencesVol. 55(4)
Harvard University Press (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
German Social Sciences and History
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.