Design Parameter Impact of Wind-Averaged Drag Optimization

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">With the increasing prevalence of electric vehicles (EVs), decreasing vehicle drag is of upmost importance, as range is a primary consideration for customers and has a direct bearing on the cost of the vehicle. While the relationship between drag and range is well understood, there exists a discrepancy between the label range and the real-world range experienced by customers. One of the factors influencing the difference is the ambient wind condition that modifies the resultant air speed and yaw angle, which is typically minimized during SAE coast-down testing. The following study implements a singular wind-averaged drag (WAD) coefficient which is derived from a 3-point yaw curve to show the impact of yaw as compared to the zero-yaw condition. This leads to an interesting dilemma for the vehicle aerodynamicist: whether to optimize the vehicle's exterior shape for low wind (zero yaw) conditions or for real-world conditions where the ambient wind generally produces a few degrees of yaw. This paper uses a generic truck and SUV model (GTU) modified to contain a flat floor to simulate an electric vehicle and evaluated in CFD simulation to demonstrate the difference in common aerodynamic features when optimizing for zero-yaw drag vs wind-averaged drag.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8772
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design Parameter Impact of Wind-Averaged Drag Optimization

Meghan Kaminski, Andrew D'Hooge, Zackery Borton
1 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
4.99
article

Design Parameter Impact of Wind-Averaged Drag Optimization

Meghan Kaminski, Andrew D'Hooge, Zackery Borton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">With the increasing prevalence of electric vehicles (EVs), decreasing vehicle drag is of upmost importance, as range is a primary consideration for customers and has a direct bearing on the cost of the vehicle. While the relationship between drag and range is well understood, there exists a discrepancy between the label range and the real-world range experienced by customers. One of the factors influencing the difference is the ambient wind condition that modifies the resultant air speed and yaw angle, which is typically minimized during SAE coast-down testing. The following study implements a singular wind-averaged drag (WAD) coefficient which is derived from a 3-point yaw curve to show the impact of yaw as compared to the zero-yaw condition. This leads to an interesting dilemma for the vehicle aerodynamicist: whether to optimize the vehicle's exterior shape for low wind (zero yaw) conditions or for real-world conditions where the ambient wind generally produces a few degrees of yaw. This paper uses a generic truck and SUV model (GTU) modified to contain a flat floor to simulate an electric vehicle and evaluated in CFD simulation to demonstrate the difference in common aerodynamic features when optimizing for zero-yaw drag vs wind-averaged drag.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Rivian
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.