On the Potentially Misleading Evaluation of CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions for Hybrid-Electric Vehicles

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The adoption of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) is becoming more popular during the last few years due to government incentives and favourable legislation both for automotive companies and final users. This type of vehicle claims very low carbon dioxide emissions while eliminating the range anxiety associated with battery electric vehicles thanks to the on-board range extender being able to recharge the battery throughout the journey. Unfortunately, the low emissions values are more representative of the particular mathematical model implemented by the legislation than the measured real driving emissions. Specifically, the legislation does not take into account the CO<sub>2</sub> embedded in production of the batteries or of the electrical energy stored in it. This work analyses these aspects by means of a numerical model of the BMW i3 94Ah vehicle. The results obtained are collected from simulations conducted over the Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) by using the commercial software GT-Power. The numerical model has been built with parameters presented in literature and validated against experimental data originally published as part of an Argonne National Laboratories research project. The model assessed all the most important energetic and emissions parameters over the regulated driving cycle such as the instantaneous fuel and electrical energy consumptions together with the CO<sub>2</sub> produced by the fuel, the instantaneous vehicle power and the total energy needed to complete the driving cycle. The standard CO<sub>2</sub> results are then compared with the same one also considering the CO<sub>2</sub> embedded in the battery. Finally, an extreme interpretation of the analysis illustrates the misleading approach taken by the legislation in the definition of the CO<sub>2</sub> emission for a HEV and discusses a more suitable way to evaluate them.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8537
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Potentially Misleading Evaluation of CO2 Emissions for Hybrid-Electric Vehicles

Giovanni Vorraro, James W. G. Turner
2 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
article

On the Potentially Misleading Evaluation of CO2 Emissions for Hybrid-Electric Vehicles

Giovanni Vorraro, James W. G. Turner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The adoption of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) is becoming more popular during the last few years due to government incentives and favourable legislation both for automotive companies and final users. This type of vehicle claims very low carbon dioxide emissions while eliminating the range anxiety associated with battery electric vehicles thanks to the on-board range extender being able to recharge the battery throughout the journey. Unfortunately, the low emissions values are more representative of the particular mathematical model implemented by the legislation than the measured real driving emissions. Specifically, the legislation does not take into account the CO<sub>2</sub> embedded in production of the batteries or of the electrical energy stored in it. This work analyses these aspects by means of a numerical model of the BMW i3 94Ah vehicle. The results obtained are collected from simulations conducted over the Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) by using the commercial software GT-Power. The numerical model has been built with parameters presented in literature and validated against experimental data originally published as part of an Argonne National Laboratories research project. The model assessed all the most important energetic and emissions parameters over the regulated driving cycle such as the instantaneous fuel and electrical energy consumptions together with the CO<sub>2</sub> produced by the fuel, the instantaneous vehicle power and the total energy needed to complete the driving cycle. The standard CO<sub>2</sub> results are then compared with the same one also considering the CO<sub>2</sub> embedded in the battery. Finally, an extreme interpretation of the analysis illustrates the misleading approach taken by the legislation in the definition of the CO<sub>2</sub> emission for a HEV and discusses a more suitable way to evaluate them.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Kootenay Association for Science & Technology (CA), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.