Dynamic Driving Task Assessment Scores for Scenarios Navigated by an OEM ADS-Equipped Vehicle

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">One of the major issues facing the automated driving system (ADS)-equipped vehicle (AV) industry is how to evaluate the performance of an AV as it navigates a given scenario. The development and validation of a sound, consistent, and transparent dynamic driving task (DDT) assessment (DA) methodology is a key component of the safety case framework (SCF) of the Automated Vehicle – Test and Evaluation Process (AV-TEP) Mission, a collaboration between Science Foundation Arizona and Arizona State University.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The DA methodology was presented in earlier work and includes the DA metrics from the recently published SAE J3237 Recommended Practice. This work extends and implements the methodology with an AV developed by OEM May Mobility in four diverse, real-world scenarios: (1) an oncoming vehicle entering the AV’s lane, (2) vulnerable road user (VRU) crossing in front of the AV’s path, (3) a vehicle executing a three-point turn encroaches into the AV’s path, and (4) the AV exhibiting aggressive acceleration through an intersection.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The assessment of each scenario navigation by the May Mobility AV is provided by two versions of the DA Score: (1) a simple, single grade that incorporates the applicable DA metrics violations and severity of the violations, (2) the DA Score modified by weighting factors of the scenario complexity and relevance to the AV’s ODD, along with the test method fidelity.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The objective of the work is to demonstrate the DA methodology in an actual OEM AV application in a variety of scenarios. The aggregation of DA Scores (unweighted and weighted) is a key input to the AV-TEP SCF that provides safety assurance of the AV under development.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8672
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vehicle emissions and performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Driving Task Assessment Scores for Scenarios Navigated by an OEM ADS-Equipped Vehicle

Sachin Kumar Singh, Jeffrey Wishart, Steven Como, Junfeng Zhao et al.
1 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Vehicle emissions and performance
0.68
article

Dynamic Driving Task Assessment Scores for Scenarios Navigated by an OEM ADS-Equipped Vehicle

Sachin Kumar Singh, Jeffrey Wishart, Steven Como, Junfeng Zhao, Sunder Swaminathan, Shujauddin Rahimi, Matt Frantz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">One of the major issues facing the automated driving system (ADS)-equipped vehicle (AV) industry is how to evaluate the performance of an AV as it navigates a given scenario. The development and validation of a sound, consistent, and transparent dynamic driving task (DDT) assessment (DA) methodology is a key component of the safety case framework (SCF) of the Automated Vehicle – Test and Evaluation Process (AV-TEP) Mission, a collaboration between Science Foundation Arizona and Arizona State University.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The DA methodology was presented in earlier work and includes the DA metrics from the recently published SAE J3237 Recommended Practice. This work extends and implements the methodology with an AV developed by OEM May Mobility in four diverse, real-world scenarios: (1) an oncoming vehicle entering the AV’s lane, (2) vulnerable road user (VRU) crossing in front of the AV’s path, (3) a vehicle executing a three-point turn encroaches into the AV’s path, and (4) the AV exhibiting aggressive acceleration through an intersection.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The assessment of each scenario navigation by the May Mobility AV is provided by two versions of the DA Score: (1) a simple, single grade that incorporates the applicable DA metrics violations and severity of the violations, (2) the DA Score modified by weighting factors of the scenario complexity and relevance to the AV’s ODD, along with the test method fidelity.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The objective of the work is to demonstrate the DA methodology in an actual OEM AV application in a variety of scenarios. The aggregation of DA Scores (unweighted and weighted) is a key input to the AV-TEP SCF that provides safety assurance of the AV under development.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Exponent (United States) (US), Science Foundation Arizona (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Vehicle emissions and performance
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.