Comparative analysis between Garuda Indonesia and Lion Air: A study of Indonesia’s leading airlines

<p>This paper compares Garuda Indonesia and Lion Air, two leading Indonesian airlines, focusing on their operational, financial, and strategic differences. Garuda, a state-owned full-service airline, targets business and international travelers with a focus on premium services and safety, while Lion Air, a low-cost carrier (LCC), caters to budget-conscious passengers through affordability and extensive domestic coverage. The study highlights Indonesia’s reliance on air travel due to its archipelagic geography and explores how these airlines shape market competition and passenger experiences. Employing qualitative and quantitative analysis, the paper uses industry reports, financial data, and customer reviews to examine their operational efficiency and market strategies. It finds that while Lion Air’s low-cost model is cost-effective, its safety record impacts customer trust. Garuda Indonesia, on the other hand, struggles with financial sustainability. The study suggests that a balanced regulatory approach could enhance national connectivity and economic growth by supporting both service models.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Business and Management Theory and Practice
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54517/bmtp3275
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Law and Aviation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis between Garuda Indonesia and Lion Air: A study of Indonesia’s leading airlines

Jiwon Lee, Amit Joshi
1 citations
Business and Management Theory and Practice
International Law and Aviation
8.52
article

Comparative analysis between Garuda Indonesia and Lion Air: A study of Indonesia’s leading airlines

Jiwon Lee, Amit Joshi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<p>This paper compares Garuda Indonesia and Lion Air, two leading Indonesian airlines, focusing on their operational, financial, and strategic differences. Garuda, a state-owned full-service airline, targets business and international travelers with a focus on premium services and safety, while Lion Air, a low-cost carrier (LCC), caters to budget-conscious passengers through affordability and extensive domestic coverage. The study highlights Indonesia’s reliance on air travel due to its archipelagic geography and explores how these airlines shape market competition and passenger experiences. Employing qualitative and quantitative analysis, the paper uses industry reports, financial data, and customer reviews to examine their operational efficiency and market strategies. It finds that while Lion Air’s low-cost model is cost-effective, its safety record impacts customer trust. Garuda Indonesia, on the other hand, struggles with financial sustainability. The study suggests that a balanced regulatory approach could enhance national connectivity and economic growth by supporting both service models.</p>

Business and Management Theory and PracticeVol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
International Law and Aviation
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.