Identifying Negative Driver States that Share Commonalities for Interventions

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Advancements in sensor technologies have led to increased interest in detecting and diagnosing “driver states”—collections of internal driver factors generally associated with negative driving performance, such as alcohol intoxication, cognitive load, stress, and fatigue. This is accomplished using imperfect behavioral and physiological indicators that are associated with those states. An example is the use of elevated heart rate variability, detected by a steering wheel sensor, as an indicator of frustration. Advances in sensor technologies, coupled with improvements in machine learning, have led to an increase in this research. However, a limitation is that it often excludes naturalistic driving environments, which may have conditions that affect detection. For example, reductions in visual scanning are often associated with cognitive load [<span class="xref">1</span>]; however, these reductions can also be related to novice driver inexperience [<span class="xref">2</span>] and alcohol intoxication [<span class="xref">3</span>]. Through our analysis of the research, we discover that the tendency to explore these singular driver states with only a comparison to “normal” driving is common. Additionally, research on interventions for these driver states is relatively scarce (fewer than 10% of cognitive load-related papers we examined assessed or discussed intervention solutions) and narrowly tailored to specific states [e.g., 4, vis-à-vis cognitive load]. States that share common behavioral and physiological markers tend to be explored independently when a more universal and integrated approach may be warranted. In this paper, we identify the need for a driver state and intervention framework that addresses these limitations by exploring state indicators and their overlap, interventions for one or multiple states, and major research gaps. Our framework offers practical approaches for handling one or many driver states, including interventions that may be deployed at different timings during a trip.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8676
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Negative Driver States that Share Commonalities for Interventions

Sean Seaman, Linda C. Angell, John K. Lenneman, Joshua Domeyer et al.
SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Identifying Negative Driver States that Share Commonalities for Interventions

Sean Seaman, Linda C. Angell, John K. Lenneman, Joshua Domeyer, Peihan Zhong
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Advancements in sensor technologies have led to increased interest in detecting and diagnosing “driver states”—collections of internal driver factors generally associated with negative driving performance, such as alcohol intoxication, cognitive load, stress, and fatigue. This is accomplished using imperfect behavioral and physiological indicators that are associated with those states. An example is the use of elevated heart rate variability, detected by a steering wheel sensor, as an indicator of frustration. Advances in sensor technologies, coupled with improvements in machine learning, have led to an increase in this research. However, a limitation is that it often excludes naturalistic driving environments, which may have conditions that affect detection. For example, reductions in visual scanning are often associated with cognitive load [<span class="xref">1</span>]; however, these reductions can also be related to novice driver inexperience [<span class="xref">2</span>] and alcohol intoxication [<span class="xref">3</span>]. Through our analysis of the research, we discover that the tendency to explore these singular driver states with only a comparison to “normal” driving is common. Additionally, research on interventions for these driver states is relatively scarce (fewer than 10% of cognitive load-related papers we examined assessed or discussed intervention solutions) and narrowly tailored to specific states [e.g., 4, vis-à-vis cognitive load]. States that share common behavioral and physiological markers tend to be explored independently when a more universal and integrated approach may be warranted. In this paper, we identify the need for a driver state and intervention framework that addresses these limitations by exploring state indicators and their overlap, interventions for one or multiple states, and major research gaps. Our framework offers practical approaches for handling one or many driver states, including interventions that may be deployed at different timings during a trip.</div></div>

SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in MobilityVol. 07(5)
Toyota Motor Corporation (Switzerland) (CH), Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.