Experimental Study of Glow Plug Assisted Methanol Compression Ignition

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Methanol can be produced renewably and used in compression ignition (CI) engines as a replacement for fossil diesel. However, methanol is a low cetane fuel, creating challenges in achieving stable operation, particularly at low load. One potential solution is through surface ignition via a glow plug. In this work, experiments were conducted on a methanol-fueled 2.1 L single cylinder engine instrumented with a glow plug. The engine was designed for alcohol combustion with an elevated compression ratio (26:1) and a narrow injector umbrella angle (120 degrees) compared to standard diesel compression ignition hardware. As such, no plume was directly intercepted by the glow plug. A representative low load case of two conventional mixing controlled compression ignition (MCCI) strategies (single injection and pilot-main) and three kinetically controlled advanced CI strategies (homogenous charge compression ignition, split injection, partially premixed combustion) were tested with and without the glow plug active. It was found that the glow plug had no significant impact on either MCCI strategy because no plume was directly intercepted by the glow plug. In the advanced combustion strategies, the glow plug advanced combustion phasing by several degrees, due to an apparent combination of charge heating and small amounts of exothermic reactions from fuel located near the glow plug during the compression stroke. When the charge was heavily stratified, it was hypothesized that flames could propagate from the glow plug and the start of combustion could advance substantially. However, this significantly decreased low load stability as cyclic variability in the local conditions near the glow plug resulted in high cyclic variability in flame propagation and subsequent autoignition of the charge. This work highlights the potential incompatibility between narrow angled injectors designed for alcohol CI and glow plugs, as well as the ineffectiveness of glow plugs in alcohol fueled advanced combustion strategies.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8412
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Study of Glow Plug Assisted Methanol Compression Ignition

Sebastian Verhelst, Brian Gainey, Martin Tunér, Magnus Svensson
1 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
0.72
article

Experimental Study of Glow Plug Assisted Methanol Compression Ignition

Sebastian Verhelst, Brian Gainey, Martin Tunér, Magnus Svensson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Methanol can be produced renewably and used in compression ignition (CI) engines as a replacement for fossil diesel. However, methanol is a low cetane fuel, creating challenges in achieving stable operation, particularly at low load. One potential solution is through surface ignition via a glow plug. In this work, experiments were conducted on a methanol-fueled 2.1 L single cylinder engine instrumented with a glow plug. The engine was designed for alcohol combustion with an elevated compression ratio (26:1) and a narrow injector umbrella angle (120 degrees) compared to standard diesel compression ignition hardware. As such, no plume was directly intercepted by the glow plug. A representative low load case of two conventional mixing controlled compression ignition (MCCI) strategies (single injection and pilot-main) and three kinetically controlled advanced CI strategies (homogenous charge compression ignition, split injection, partially premixed combustion) were tested with and without the glow plug active. It was found that the glow plug had no significant impact on either MCCI strategy because no plume was directly intercepted by the glow plug. In the advanced combustion strategies, the glow plug advanced combustion phasing by several degrees, due to an apparent combination of charge heating and small amounts of exothermic reactions from fuel located near the glow plug during the compression stroke. When the charge was heavily stratified, it was hypothesized that flames could propagate from the glow plug and the start of combustion could advance substantially. However, this significantly decreased low load stability as cyclic variability in the local conditions near the glow plug resulted in high cyclic variability in flame propagation and subsequent autoignition of the charge. This work highlights the potential incompatibility between narrow angled injectors designed for alcohol CI and glow plugs, as well as the ineffectiveness of glow plugs in alcohol fueled advanced combustion strategies.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Lund University (SE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.