Numerical study on the influence of creep behavior of geosynthetic reinforcements on the mechanical behavior of reinforced soil bridge abutments

<p indent="0mm">Numerical simulation is a widely adopted method for predicting the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments. In current studies, geosynthetic reinforcement materials are typically modeled as linear elastic with constant tensile stiffness derived from constant rate-of-strain (CRS) tensile tests. However, many common geosynthetic materials exhibit significant creep behavior under practical engineering tensile conditions, which can substantially affect the mechanical behavior of reinforced soil structures. This paper employs the finite difference method to simulate GRS abutments, incorporating reinforcement modeled with constant stiffness that neglects creep, as well as both constant and nonlinear stiffness that account for creep behavior. The influence of creep characteristics on the service performance of the abutments is examined. The simulation results reveal that GRS abutments modeled with nonlinear stiffness considering creep demonstrate mechanical behavior comparable to those with constant stiffness that also accounts for creep, though the latter exhibits slightly greater deformations and reinforcement strains. In contrast, the deformations and strains calculated using constant stiffness from CRS tests are significantly lower than those in the scenarios that incorporate creep, with the discrepancy increasing as the load intensifies. Notably, the tensile force in the reinforcement modeled with CRS-derived stiffness is higher than in the other two scenarios. For the HDPE geogrid widely used for GRS abutments in the field, the reduction factor for the required tensile strength due to creep is approximately 1.2, this value remains relatively stable under varying service load conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientia Sinica Technologica
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1360/sst-2024-0322
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical study on the influence of creep behavior of geosynthetic reinforcements on the mechanical behavior of reinforced soil bridge abutments

J. P. Zheng, Yewei Zheng, Deng Jialong
Scientia Sinica Technologica
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Numerical study on the influence of creep behavior of geosynthetic reinforcements on the mechanical behavior of reinforced soil bridge abutments

J. P. Zheng, Yewei Zheng, Deng Jialong
article en

Abstract

<p indent="0mm">Numerical simulation is a widely adopted method for predicting the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutments. In current studies, geosynthetic reinforcement materials are typically modeled as linear elastic with constant tensile stiffness derived from constant rate-of-strain (CRS) tensile tests. However, many common geosynthetic materials exhibit significant creep behavior under practical engineering tensile conditions, which can substantially affect the mechanical behavior of reinforced soil structures. This paper employs the finite difference method to simulate GRS abutments, incorporating reinforcement modeled with constant stiffness that neglects creep, as well as both constant and nonlinear stiffness that account for creep behavior. The influence of creep characteristics on the service performance of the abutments is examined. The simulation results reveal that GRS abutments modeled with nonlinear stiffness considering creep demonstrate mechanical behavior comparable to those with constant stiffness that also accounts for creep, though the latter exhibits slightly greater deformations and reinforcement strains. In contrast, the deformations and strains calculated using constant stiffness from CRS tests are significantly lower than those in the scenarios that incorporate creep, with the discrepancy increasing as the load intensifies. Notably, the tensile force in the reinforcement modeled with CRS-derived stiffness is higher than in the other two scenarios. For the HDPE geogrid widely used for GRS abutments in the field, the reduction factor for the required tensile strength due to creep is approximately 1.2, this value remains relatively stable under varying service load conditions.

Scientia Sinica TechnologicaVol. 55(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.