Adapting the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Framework to Automated Vehicle Development

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Abstract</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The technological advancements in the automotive industry have seen a significant leap with the introduction of automated driving system (ADS)-equipped Vehicles (AVs), with potential for enhanced safety, efficiency, and mobility. As the development of an AV transitions from the stages of conceptual design to deployment, assessing the maturity of the technology through a structured framework is crucial.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper proposes the adaptation of the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) framework originally developed by NASA (and adopted widely in a variety of industries) to the AV industry to provide a consistent, understandable, and transparent method to describe an AV product’s stage of development. The TRL framework is mated to the existing safety case framework (SCF) developed in the Automated Vehicle – Test and Evaluation Process (AV-TEP) Mission, a collaboration between Science Foundation Arizona and Arizona State University. The claim that the AV is ready to transition from one TRL to the next is argued through the satisfaction of requirements for each TRL and supported by evidence and data.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The requirements for each level are established for the three pillars of the AV-TEP Mission’s SCF, each of which address safety-critical aspects of AV development: the Safety Management System pillar focuses on organizational safety and mitigation of identified risks, the Design Methods pillar emphasizes the importance of rigorous engineering design practices, and the Testing pillar validates and verifies the AV and its subsystems through various testing methods.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper aims to address the need for all stakeholders (AV developers, regulatory agencies, and the general public) to concur on the development state of an AV at any given time and provide an agreed-upon roadmap for when and how the transition through each stage of development should occur. The ultimate culmination of this TRL-framed process is the on-road deployment of the AV in its particular ODD and usage specification in a manner that assures public safety.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8671
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Framework to Automated Vehicle Development

Brendan J. Russo, Jeffrey Wishart, Junfeng Zhao, Sunder Swaminathan et al.
3 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Technology Assessment and Management
3.91
article

Adapting the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Framework to Automated Vehicle Development

Brendan J. Russo, Jeffrey Wishart, Junfeng Zhao, Sunder Swaminathan, Shujauddin Rahimi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Abstract</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The technological advancements in the automotive industry have seen a significant leap with the introduction of automated driving system (ADS)-equipped Vehicles (AVs), with potential for enhanced safety, efficiency, and mobility. As the development of an AV transitions from the stages of conceptual design to deployment, assessing the maturity of the technology through a structured framework is crucial.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper proposes the adaptation of the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) framework originally developed by NASA (and adopted widely in a variety of industries) to the AV industry to provide a consistent, understandable, and transparent method to describe an AV product’s stage of development. The TRL framework is mated to the existing safety case framework (SCF) developed in the Automated Vehicle – Test and Evaluation Process (AV-TEP) Mission, a collaboration between Science Foundation Arizona and Arizona State University. The claim that the AV is ready to transition from one TRL to the next is argued through the satisfaction of requirements for each TRL and supported by evidence and data.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The requirements for each level are established for the three pillars of the AV-TEP Mission’s SCF, each of which address safety-critical aspects of AV development: the Safety Management System pillar focuses on organizational safety and mitigation of identified risks, the Design Methods pillar emphasizes the importance of rigorous engineering design practices, and the Testing pillar validates and verifies the AV and its subsystems through various testing methods.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper aims to address the need for all stakeholders (AV developers, regulatory agencies, and the general public) to concur on the development state of an AV at any given time and provide an agreed-upon roadmap for when and how the transition through each stage of development should occur. The ultimate culmination of this TRL-framed process is the on-road deployment of the AV in its particular ODD and usage specification in a manner that assures public safety.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Northern Arizona University (US), Science Foundation Arizona (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Technology Assessment and Management
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.