Safe Deployment of AI and ML Based Software and Algorithms in ADAS Systems

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">As the autonomy of ADAS features are moving from SAE level 0 autonomy to SAE level 5 autonomy of operation, reliance on AI/ML based algorithms in ADAS critical functions like perception, fusion and path planning are increasing predominantly. AI/ML based algorithms offer exceptional performance of the ADAS features, at the same time these advanced algorithms also bring in safety challenges as well. This paper explores the functional safety aspects of AI/ML based systems in ADAS functions like perception, object fusion and path planning, by discussing the safety requirements development for AI/ML systems, dataset safety life cycle, verification and validation of AI systems, and safety analysis used for AI systems. Among all the safety aspects listed above, emphasis is put on dataset safety lifecycle as that is not only the most important element for training ML based algorithms for ADAS usage, but also the most cumbersome and expensive. The safety characteristics associated with dataset lifecycle are dataset safety analysis, dataset requirements development, dataset design and implementation, dataset verification and validation and then finally dataset maintenance. All these dataset life cycle characteristics are discussed in detail. Holistically, this paper outlines the process flow on what is needed from safety point of view to evaluate AI/ML based systems to claim the vehicles with advanced AI/ML systems are free from unreasonable risk. Also, considering perception system as an example, Key Performance Indicators (KPI) from safety perspective are defined to explain the acceptance and rejection criteria of the AI/ML based perception system.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8071
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safe Deployment of AI and ML Based Software and Algorithms in ADAS Systems

Venkateswara Raju Mudunuri, Hossam Almasri, M. Chandrasekaran, Hsing-Hua Fan
1 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Fault Detection and Control Systems
1.21
article

Safe Deployment of AI and ML Based Software and Algorithms in ADAS Systems

Venkateswara Raju Mudunuri, Hossam Almasri, M. Chandrasekaran, Hsing-Hua Fan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">As the autonomy of ADAS features are moving from SAE level 0 autonomy to SAE level 5 autonomy of operation, reliance on AI/ML based algorithms in ADAS critical functions like perception, fusion and path planning are increasing predominantly. AI/ML based algorithms offer exceptional performance of the ADAS features, at the same time these advanced algorithms also bring in safety challenges as well. This paper explores the functional safety aspects of AI/ML based systems in ADAS functions like perception, object fusion and path planning, by discussing the safety requirements development for AI/ML systems, dataset safety life cycle, verification and validation of AI systems, and safety analysis used for AI systems. Among all the safety aspects listed above, emphasis is put on dataset safety lifecycle as that is not only the most important element for training ML based algorithms for ADAS usage, but also the most cumbersome and expensive. The safety characteristics associated with dataset lifecycle are dataset safety analysis, dataset requirements development, dataset design and implementation, dataset verification and validation and then finally dataset maintenance. All these dataset life cycle characteristics are discussed in detail. Holistically, this paper outlines the process flow on what is needed from safety point of view to evaluate AI/ML based systems to claim the vehicles with advanced AI/ML systems are free from unreasonable risk. Also, considering perception system as an example, Key Performance Indicators (KPI) from safety perspective are defined to explain the acceptance and rejection criteria of the AI/ML based perception system.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
General Motors (Poland) (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.