On the Critical Importance of Physical Modelling for the Analysis of Coast-Down Data

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Novel experimental and analytical methods were developed with the objective of improving the reliability and repeatability of coast-down test results. The methods were applied to coast-down tests of a SUV and a tractor-trailer combination, for which aerodynamic wind-tunnel data were available for comparison. The rationale was to minimize the number of unknowns in the equation of motion by measuring rolling and mechanical resistances and wheel-axle moments of inertia, which was achieved using novel experimental techniques and conventional rotating-drum tests. This led to new modelling functions for the rolling and mechanical resistances in the equation of motion, which was solved by regression analysis. The resulting aerodynamic drag coefficient was closer to its wind-tunnel counterpart, and the predicted low-speed road load was closer to direct measurements, than the results obtained using conventional methods. It is anticipated that applying the novel techniques to characterize the rolling and mechanical resistances and wheel inertia of a large number of vehicles and tires may lead to more accurate, generalized models for the terms in the equation of motion. Uncertainty remains in the applicability of the rolling-resistance model to the current data set, due to a discrepancy between the surface texture of the test drum used to characterize the speed dependence and the structure of the rough, uneven track pavement. A re-evaluation of the coast-down data, whereby a parameter governing the speed-dependence of the rolling resistance was treated as a third unknown, resulted in aberrant values of the drag coefficient. It is hypothesized that the function used to model rolling resistance was not fully representative of the pavement conditions and that an additional term would be required to capture the physical interaction between the rugged track and the test vehicles. This emphasized the critical importance of proper physical modelling with a minimal number of unknown parameters.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8774
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Critical Importance of Physical Modelling for the Analysis of Coast-Down Data

Bernard Tanguay, Fenella de Souza
SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

On the Critical Importance of Physical Modelling for the Analysis of Coast-Down Data

Bernard Tanguay, Fenella de Souza
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Novel experimental and analytical methods were developed with the objective of improving the reliability and repeatability of coast-down test results. The methods were applied to coast-down tests of a SUV and a tractor-trailer combination, for which aerodynamic wind-tunnel data were available for comparison. The rationale was to minimize the number of unknowns in the equation of motion by measuring rolling and mechanical resistances and wheel-axle moments of inertia, which was achieved using novel experimental techniques and conventional rotating-drum tests. This led to new modelling functions for the rolling and mechanical resistances in the equation of motion, which was solved by regression analysis. The resulting aerodynamic drag coefficient was closer to its wind-tunnel counterpart, and the predicted low-speed road load was closer to direct measurements, than the results obtained using conventional methods. It is anticipated that applying the novel techniques to characterize the rolling and mechanical resistances and wheel inertia of a large number of vehicles and tires may lead to more accurate, generalized models for the terms in the equation of motion. Uncertainty remains in the applicability of the rolling-resistance model to the current data set, due to a discrepancy between the surface texture of the test drum used to characterize the speed dependence and the structure of the rough, uneven track pavement. A re-evaluation of the coast-down data, whereby a parameter governing the speed-dependence of the rolling resistance was treated as a third unknown, resulted in aberrant values of the drag coefficient. It is hypothesized that the function used to model rolling resistance was not fully representative of the pavement conditions and that an additional term would be required to capture the physical interaction between the rugged track and the test vehicles. This emphasized the critical importance of proper physical modelling with a minimal number of unknown parameters.</div></div>

SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in MobilityVol. 07(5)
National Research Council Canada (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.