Comprehensive Investigation of Combustion Characteristics, Emissions, and Tribological Properties of Synthetic Kerosene (S8) in a CVCC and CRDI Research Engine

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">There is a need to reduce both the greenhouse gas emissions of internal combustion engines, and the reliance on traditional fossil fuels like Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD). In this research, a synthetic paraffinic kerosene fuel, designated S8 and created from natural gas feedstocks using the Fischer-Tropsch process was investigated to determine its autoignition and combustion characteristics, emissions, and tribological properties. This fuel, S8, was found to have a Derived Cetane Number (DCN) of 62, which reflects a shorter Ignition Delay (ID), and Combustion Delay (CD) compared to ULSD, which has a DCN of 48. However, due to the chemical properties of S8, it lacks sufficient lubrication qualities in comparison to ULSD, so addition of 3% methyl oleate by mass was used to improve lubricity. The shorter ignition delay of S8, initially observed in a Constant Volume Combustion Chamber (CVCC) and confirmed in a fired Common Rail Direct Injection (CRDI) experimental engine. Investigations with Mie scattering He-Ne laser instrument, revealed the superior atomization of S8, which resulted in a Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) of 19.2 μm, 8% smaller than that of ULSD. The combined effect of the superior atomization and shorter ID of S8 resulted in a reduction of the premixed combustion event for S8, with smoother engine operation due to the greater proportion of mixing-controlled combustion. This characteristic was also reflected in the comparison of the Low Temperature Heat Release (LTHR) region of S8 with that of ULSD. In LTHR, S8 released more energy during the low temperature cool flame formation region and entered High Temperature Heat Release (HTHR) sooner than ULSD. Analysis of the emissions of the CRDI engine when operated with S8 was conducted with the engine under a sustained load at 5.4 bar Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (IMEP), and the results were compared with identical operating parameters using ULSD. A 14% reduction in NOx emissions and a 33% reduction in soot was achieved compared to ULSD.</div></div>