Towards biologically realistic estimates of home range and spatial exposure for colonial animals

Abstract Mobile colonial animals are particularly vulnerable to localised stressors around their colonies. Accurate home range (HR) estimation is therefore fundamental for spatial risk assessment. HRs are shaped by complex interactions between landscape permeability to movement and spatial resource competition between and within colonies, which are challenging to implement with density estimation methods (e.g. kernel smoothing) or species distribution models. We propose a new HR estimation method for colonial animals that accounts for such spatially complex interactions without computationally expensive individual‐based modelling (IBM). We present a model for colony space use following mechanistic rules of (1) heterogeneous landscape permeability, (2) between‐ and within‐colony density‐dependent competition, (3) flexible definitions of overlap between colonies, and (4) secondary space use due to commuting. Using the example of Northern gannets ( Morus bassanus ) foraging around the British Isles, we show how model parameters can be fitted to a small subset of tracking data from a colony network and how resulting estimated HRs can be used to derive colony‐specific exposure to a spatial stressor (offshore wind farms). Validation with simulated data showed a high level of overlap between true and estimated HRs and no significant difference between true and estimated colony‐specific exposure to an example stressor. Estimated gannet HRs showed striking similarities to tracking data from 10 gannet colonies. Our model assigned 73% of tracking locations to their correct colonies, compared to 41% and 31% from HRs derived from two approaches commonly used for risk assessments. These methods also underestimated exposure compared to our model‐derived HR. In contrast to industry‐standard approaches, our method relies neither on exhaustive tracking from all colonies nor on computer‐intensive IBMs. Rather, it can predict HRs from colony size estimates and locations and can be flexibly tuned to different species' characteristics to investigate fundamental and applied questions on colonial space‐use patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards biologically realistic estimates of home range and spatial exposure for colonial animals

Jason Matthiopoulos, Jana W. E. Jeglinski, Geert M. Aarts, Ewan D. Wakefield et al.
1 citations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Towards biologically realistic estimates of home range and spatial exposure for colonial animals

Jason Matthiopoulos, Jana W. E. Jeglinski, Geert M. Aarts, Ewan D. Wakefield, Holly I. Niven
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mobile colonial animals are particularly vulnerable to localised stressors around their colonies. Accurate home range (HR) estimation is therefore fundamental for spatial risk assessment. HRs are shaped by complex interactions between landscape permeability to movement and spatial resource competition between and within colonies, which are challenging to implement with density estimation methods (e.g. kernel smoothing) or species distribution models. We propose a new HR estimation method for colonial animals that accounts for such spatially complex interactions without computationally expensive individual‐based modelling (IBM). We present a model for colony space use following mechanistic rules of (1) heterogeneous landscape permeability, (2) between‐ and within‐colony density‐dependent competition, (3) flexible definitions of overlap between colonies, and (4) secondary space use due to commuting. Using the example of Northern gannets ( Morus bassanus ) foraging around the British Isles, we show how model parameters can be fitted to a small subset of tracking data from a colony network and how resulting estimated HRs can be used to derive colony‐specific exposure to a spatial stressor (offshore wind farms). Validation with simulated data showed a high level of overlap between true and estimated HRs and no significant difference between true and estimated colony‐specific exposure to an example stressor. Estimated gannet HRs showed striking similarities to tracking data from 10 gannet colonies. Our model assigned 73% of tracking locations to their correct colonies, compared to 41% and 31% from HRs derived from two approaches commonly used for risk assessments. These methods also underestimated exposure compared to our model‐derived HR. In contrast to industry‐standard approaches, our method relies neither on exhaustive tracking from all colonies nor on computer‐intensive IBMs. Rather, it can predict HRs from colony size estimates and locations and can be flexibly tuned to different species' characteristics to investigate fundamental and applied questions on colonial space‐use patterns.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(5)
Durham University (GB), Aarhus University (DK), University of Glasgow (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.