The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence to manipulate or enhance natural ecosystems and biodiversity

In light of the grave threats posed to biodiversity and natural ecosystems by human activity, artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a potent and promising instrument for their preservation. However, it is imperative to acknowledge the concomitant risks and uncertainties associated with AI. The integration of AI into ecological systems may potentially disrupt the intricate balance and integrity of these ecosystems, adversely impacting the rights and interests of diverse stakeholders, and resulting in unanticipated, permanent effects on the continuity of life as we know it. In this work, I discuss the ethical issues involved in utilizing AI to control or improve natural ecosystems and biodiversity by referencing five literature-based arguments. These arguments include the following: loss of authenticity, justice and equity, long-term effects, environmental impact, and ethical duty. I contend that the ethical question of using AI to manage ecosystems and conserve biodiversity is intricate and varied, necessitating a thoughtful and nuanced approach. To establish a moral framework for the responsible use of AI to improve biodiversity, the precautionary principle was investigated and its shortcomings examined. Based on Unesco's four AI integration principles, the "Ecosystem-Centric ai Ethical Framework" was developed as a potential framework to deal with these problems. According to this paradigm, AI should protect human rights and dignity as well as the rights of nature. It should also be monitored and evaluated, and there should be procedures for accountability and redress in the event of harmful effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22201/pub.bioeticaunam.2024.1.6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence to manipulate or enhance natural ecosystems and biodiversity

Paschal Ukpaka
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence to manipulate or enhance natural ecosystems and biodiversity

Paschal Ukpaka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In light of the grave threats posed to biodiversity and natural ecosystems by human activity, artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a potent and promising instrument for their preservation. However, it is imperative to acknowledge the concomitant risks and uncertainties associated with AI. The integration of AI into ecological systems may potentially disrupt the intricate balance and integrity of these ecosystems, adversely impacting the rights and interests of diverse stakeholders, and resulting in unanticipated, permanent effects on the continuity of life as we know it. In this work, I discuss the ethical issues involved in utilizing AI to control or improve natural ecosystems and biodiversity by referencing five literature-based arguments. These arguments include the following: loss of authenticity, justice and equity, long-term effects, environmental impact, and ethical duty. I contend that the ethical question of using AI to manage ecosystems and conserve biodiversity is intricate and varied, necessitating a thoughtful and nuanced approach. To establish a moral framework for the responsible use of AI to improve biodiversity, the precautionary principle was investigated and its shortcomings examined. Based on Unesco's four AI integration principles, the "Ecosystem-Centric ai Ethical Framework" was developed as a potential framework to deal with these problems. According to this paradigm, AI should protect human rights and dignity as well as the rights of nature. It should also be monitored and evaluated, and there should be procedures for accountability and redress in the event of harmful effects.

(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.