Methods for health economic evaluation of complex interventions in healthcare: current practice, challenges and guidance for future research

Health economic methods can support the development and evaluation of new healthcare interventions by generating data on the resources used and relating these to a defined benefit. However, the standard methodology of health economic evaluation that is usually used does not do justice to the high degree of complexity of interventions in healthcare. As a result, there is a lack of decision-relevant information, for example, on the preferences of the target group, on spillover effects on the part of carers, or on implementation costs and the role of different contexts in the implementation of interventions into routine care. The UK Medical Research Council's (MRC) standard-setting framework for complex interventions therefore emphasises the need to incorporate health economic aspects more strongly into all phases of the development and evaluation of complex interventions. To make this possible, the MRC's recommendations for expanding and adapting the standard methodology of health economic evaluation must be concretised and supplemented. Building on already established methodological procedures, recommendations should be developed and proposals for necessary further research formulated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Das Gesundheitswesen
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2569-9765
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for health economic evaluation of complex interventions in healthcare: current practice, challenges and guidance for future research

Helene Eckhardt, Markus Vomhof, Dirk Müller, Cornelia Henschke et al.
Das Gesundheitswesen
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Methods for health economic evaluation of complex interventions in healthcare: current practice, challenges and guidance for future research

Helene Eckhardt, Markus Vomhof, Dirk Müller, Cornelia Henschke, Ingrid Zechmeister‐Koss, Rolf Holle, Nadja Kairies‐Schwarz, Adrienne Alayli, Juliane Köberlein–Neu, Andrea Icks, Anja Neumann, R. Albert Mohler, Johann Behrens, Damon Mohebbi, Nadja Chernyak, Sebastian Liersch
article en

Abstract

Health economic methods can support the development and evaluation of new healthcare interventions by generating data on the resources used and relating these to a defined benefit. However, the standard methodology of health economic evaluation that is usually used does not do justice to the high degree of complexity of interventions in healthcare. As a result, there is a lack of decision-relevant information, for example, on the preferences of the target group, on spillover effects on the part of carers, or on implementation costs and the role of different contexts in the implementation of interventions into routine care. The UK Medical Research Council's (MRC) standard-setting framework for complex interventions therefore emphasises the need to incorporate health economic aspects more strongly into all phases of the development and evaluation of complex interventions. To make this possible, the MRC's recommendations for expanding and adapting the standard methodology of health economic evaluation must be concretised and supplemented. Building on already established methodological procedures, recommendations should be developed and proposals for necessary further research formulated.

Das Gesundheitswesen
HTW Berlin - University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Wuppertal (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), University of Cologne (DE), Institute of Technology Assessment (AT), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH (AT), Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (DE), Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), German Center for Diabetes Research (DE), Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.