Evaluating spectral indices for water extraction: Limitations and contextual usage recommendations

• A comprehensive evaluation of water indices under complex scenarios. • MBWI, AWEInsh, and TCW are the top three performers. • Provided recommended threshold ranges and suitable scenarios for each water index. • Indices need improvement to reduce interference from buildings, shadows and snow. • Future study should develop indices capable of describing various water body states. With the intensification of climate change and human activities, water resource shortages, floods, and water quality anomalies are becoming increasingly serious. It is urgent to ensure the effective realization of water resource management, flood monitoring, and water quality assessment through fine-scale monitoring of water body spatial distribution and dynamics. Currently, various technologies have been applied to water information monitoring, with remote sensing-based spectral index methods being widely used due to their simplicity, low cost, and large-scale observation capabilities. However, the wide variety of existing water spectral indices, each suited to different scenarios and objectives, makes it challenging for ordinary users to select the most appropriate index and determine its optimal usage (i.e., threshold settings). This study addresses these challenges by evaluating the performance and applicability of 15 widely used water detection indices, using Sentinel-2 imagery across 14 representative global regions. The results revealed that the performance of water indices varied across different scenarios. Common issues include misidentification in high-reflectance backgrounds (e.g., buildings and snow), low-reflectance backgrounds (e.g., shadows), and omission errors for water bodies with high chlorophyll content. On this basis, this study provides a recommended table for water body index selection in different scenarios and a recommended range table for index thresholds, and point out key directions for future development of water body indices. This study offers valuable guidance for the selection and use of water body indices in practical application, helping to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of fine-scale monitoring of water bodies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104510
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating spectral indices for water extraction: Limitations and contextual usage recommendations

Haishuo Wei, Thiaggo C. Tayer, Hanyi Wu, Gudina Legese Feyisa et al.
10 citations
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
11.05
article

Evaluating spectral indices for water extraction: Limitations and contextual usage recommendations

Haishuo Wei, Thiaggo C. Tayer, Hanyi Wu, Gudina Legese Feyisa, Yaozhong Pan, Chuanwu Zhao, Gengchen Ma
article en
10 citations

Abstract

• A comprehensive evaluation of water indices under complex scenarios. • MBWI, AWEInsh, and TCW are the top three performers. • Provided recommended threshold ranges and suitable scenarios for each water index. • Indices need improvement to reduce interference from buildings, shadows and snow. • Future study should develop indices capable of describing various water body states. With the intensification of climate change and human activities, water resource shortages, floods, and water quality anomalies are becoming increasingly serious. It is urgent to ensure the effective realization of water resource management, flood monitoring, and water quality assessment through fine-scale monitoring of water body spatial distribution and dynamics. Currently, various technologies have been applied to water information monitoring, with remote sensing-based spectral index methods being widely used due to their simplicity, low cost, and large-scale observation capabilities. However, the wide variety of existing water spectral indices, each suited to different scenarios and objectives, makes it challenging for ordinary users to select the most appropriate index and determine its optimal usage (i.e., threshold settings). This study addresses these challenges by evaluating the performance and applicability of 15 widely used water detection indices, using Sentinel-2 imagery across 14 representative global regions. The results revealed that the performance of water indices varied across different scenarios. Common issues include misidentification in high-reflectance backgrounds (e.g., buildings and snow), low-reflectance backgrounds (e.g., shadows), and omission errors for water bodies with high chlorophyll content. On this basis, this study provides a recommended table for water body index selection in different scenarios and a recommended range table for index thresholds, and point out key directions for future development of water body indices. This study offers valuable guidance for the selection and use of water body indices in practical application, helping to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of fine-scale monitoring of water bodies.

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationVol. 139
The University of Western Australia (AU), Qinghai Normal University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science (CN), Addis Ababa University (ET)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
11.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.