Dynamics of Ethnolinguistic Nationalism and Language Education on the Korean Peninsula Following the End of the Colonial Period

This study analyzes the meaning of ethnolinguistic nationalism in Korea after colonial liberation (August 15, 1945). It focuses on orthographic standardization and examines the state of Korean language education during 1945-1948. The issue of orthography was deeply connected to the imposition of orthographic standards for the education of Japanese language in colonial Korea, and it was central to the ethnolinguistic nationalism that identified the Korean language with the Korean ethnicity. In the colonies, orthography was the basis for countering linguistic imperialism and preserving unassimilable territories within empires. The Korean Language Society’s Proposal for the Unification of Korean Orthography (1933) opposed imperialist phonecentrism with morphological orthographic norms. These were inherited as “national” orthographic norms after the liberation of Korea. However, it paradoxically functioned as a mechanism to suppress the various linguistic experiences that existed in the form of “voice.” Teachers involved in the teaching of Korean as a national language endeavoured to overcome this situation by shifting the focus of language education from the written to the vocal, or voice-centered. While maintaining a tense relationship with ethnolinguistic nationalism, Korean language education was a place where another form of nationalism was proposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New perspectives on languages.
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56395/4fs7v871
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of Ethnolinguistic Nationalism and Language Education on the Korean Peninsula Following the End of the Colonial Period

K Kim
New perspectives on languages.
Educational Research and Pedagogy
article

Dynamics of Ethnolinguistic Nationalism and Language Education on the Korean Peninsula Following the End of the Colonial Period

K Kim
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the meaning of ethnolinguistic nationalism in Korea after colonial liberation (August 15, 1945). It focuses on orthographic standardization and examines the state of Korean language education during 1945-1948. The issue of orthography was deeply connected to the imposition of orthographic standards for the education of Japanese language in colonial Korea, and it was central to the ethnolinguistic nationalism that identified the Korean language with the Korean ethnicity. In the colonies, orthography was the basis for countering linguistic imperialism and preserving unassimilable territories within empires. The Korean Language Society’s Proposal for the Unification of Korean Orthography (1933) opposed imperialist phonecentrism with morphological orthographic norms. These were inherited as “national” orthographic norms after the liberation of Korea. However, it paradoxically functioned as a mechanism to suppress the various linguistic experiences that existed in the form of “voice.” Teachers involved in the teaching of Korean as a national language endeavoured to overcome this situation by shifting the focus of language education from the written to the vocal, or voice-centered. While maintaining a tense relationship with ethnolinguistic nationalism, Korean language education was a place where another form of nationalism was proposed.

New perspectives on languages.
Keio University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.