Electrical Resistance Tomography-Based Multiphase Level Measurement Methods: A Comparison Study

The electrical resistance tomography (ERT) is an effective tool for imaging and analyzing the complex multiphase mixtures that are commonly encountered in various industrial processes. In the flotation column, the level measurements of pulp-froth interface could be made by combining the ERT with the linear sensor. Usually, the ERT images could not present clear phase boundaries; therefore, requiring a proper method to extract the interface level. In this article, two methods have been proposed, i.e., the image reconstruction method and neural network (NN)-based method. The image reconstruction method relies on the accurate image reconstruction results from which the interface is calculated. The NN-based methods do not require image reconstruction and can calculate the results directly from the raw measurements. The artificial NN (ANN) and radial basis function network (RBFN) methods have been investigated. In the numerical simulations, the image reconstruction method has demonstrated the relative error of ±6%. Comparatively, the relative error of ANN method is ±1%, while the relative error of RBFN method is ±0.5%. Experiments have also been carried out with a linear sensor of 760-mm height. In the experiments, similar accuracy levels have been achieved. The relative error of the image reconstruction method is ±8%, while the relative errors of the ANN method and RBFN method are ±1% and ±0.5%, respectively. It could be concluded that the NN-based methods could achieve higher accuracy as compared with the image reconstruction method but at the cost of longer calculation time. In both the simulations and experiments, the NN-based methods have achieved the same relative errors, suggesting their good capability in dealing with measurement noises in real industrial applications. As for the NN-based methods, the RBFN method requires less calculation time than the ANN method. It has been suggested that the image reconstruction method could be considered if fast measuring rate is needed. At the same time, the NN-based methods could achieve better accuracy and reliability, but usually at the cost of longer processing time. It might be useful to develop the hardware system that embeds the NN processing unit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3553890
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrical Resistance Tomography-Based Multiphase Level Measurement Methods: A Comparison Study

Huaxiang Wang, Ziqiang Cui, Hantao Qu, Xinyan Liu
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
0.73
article

Electrical Resistance Tomography-Based Multiphase Level Measurement Methods: A Comparison Study

Huaxiang Wang, Ziqiang Cui, Hantao Qu, Xinyan Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The electrical resistance tomography (ERT) is an effective tool for imaging and analyzing the complex multiphase mixtures that are commonly encountered in various industrial processes. In the flotation column, the level measurements of pulp-froth interface could be made by combining the ERT with the linear sensor. Usually, the ERT images could not present clear phase boundaries; therefore, requiring a proper method to extract the interface level. In this article, two methods have been proposed, i.e., the image reconstruction method and neural network (NN)-based method. The image reconstruction method relies on the accurate image reconstruction results from which the interface is calculated. The NN-based methods do not require image reconstruction and can calculate the results directly from the raw measurements. The artificial NN (ANN) and radial basis function network (RBFN) methods have been investigated. In the numerical simulations, the image reconstruction method has demonstrated the relative error of ±6%. Comparatively, the relative error of ANN method is ±1%, while the relative error of RBFN method is ±0.5%. Experiments have also been carried out with a linear sensor of 760-mm height. In the experiments, similar accuracy levels have been achieved. The relative error of the image reconstruction method is ±8%, while the relative errors of the ANN method and RBFN method are ±1% and ±0.5%, respectively. It could be concluded that the NN-based methods could achieve higher accuracy as compared with the image reconstruction method but at the cost of longer calculation time. In both the simulations and experiments, the NN-based methods have achieved the same relative errors, suggesting their good capability in dealing with measurement noises in real industrial applications. As for the NN-based methods, the RBFN method requires less calculation time than the ANN method. It has been suggested that the image reconstruction method could be considered if fast measuring rate is needed. At the same time, the NN-based methods could achieve better accuracy and reliability, but usually at the cost of longer processing time. It might be useful to develop the hardware system that embeds the NN processing unit.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementVol. 74
Tianjin University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.