Measurement of Remote Floating Capacitive Sensors: Limitations of Passive Shielding and Advantages of Active Shielding

The measurement of remote capacitive sensors requires special shielding techniques to reduce the effects of the parasitic capacitance of the interconnecting cable. According to the literature, the passive-shielding technique is suggested for floating capacitive sensors (FCSs), whereas the active-shielding technique is for grounded capacitive sensors (GCSs). This article focuses on the measurement of remote FCSs by analyzing the limitations of conventional passive shielding, then proposing the application of active shielding, which is typically restricted to the measurement of GCSs, to FCSs. The analysis is carried out theoretically, by simulations, and experimentally considering: a capacitive sensor of units of pF, cable capacitances from 100 pF to 1 nF that correspond to interconnecting cable lengths from 1 to 10 m, three commercial operational amplifiers (OAs) with different values of open-loop gain, and two operating frequencies (10 and 100 kHz). According to the results reported herein, the passive-shielding technique has significant limitations when the cable is long and the operating frequency is high. For example, at 10 m and using the best OA in terms of open-loop gain, the cable introduces an error (relative to the full scale) of around 2% at 10 kHz, but 60% at 100 kHz. The application of the active-shielding technique significantly reduces such errors, although an additional OA is required to drive the cable shield. For instance, under the same conditions indicated before, the resulting error is around 0.01% at 10 kHz and 1% at 100 kHz. Therefore, for scenarios with long interconnecting cables requiring high operating frequencies, the application of active shielding seems to be really necessary to avoid large measuring errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3556463
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement of Remote Floating Capacitive Sensors: Limitations of Passive Shielding and Advantages of Active Shielding

Valentín A. Catacora, Enrique Mario Spinelli, Ferran Reverter
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
1.49
article

Measurement of Remote Floating Capacitive Sensors: Limitations of Passive Shielding and Advantages of Active Shielding

Valentín A. Catacora, Enrique Mario Spinelli, Ferran Reverter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The measurement of remote capacitive sensors requires special shielding techniques to reduce the effects of the parasitic capacitance of the interconnecting cable. According to the literature, the passive-shielding technique is suggested for floating capacitive sensors (FCSs), whereas the active-shielding technique is for grounded capacitive sensors (GCSs). This article focuses on the measurement of remote FCSs by analyzing the limitations of conventional passive shielding, then proposing the application of active shielding, which is typically restricted to the measurement of GCSs, to FCSs. The analysis is carried out theoretically, by simulations, and experimentally considering: a capacitive sensor of units of pF, cable capacitances from 100 pF to 1 nF that correspond to interconnecting cable lengths from 1 to 10 m, three commercial operational amplifiers (OAs) with different values of open-loop gain, and two operating frequencies (10 and 100 kHz). According to the results reported herein, the passive-shielding technique has significant limitations when the cable is long and the operating frequency is high. For example, at 10 m and using the best OA in terms of open-loop gain, the cable introduces an error (relative to the full scale) of around 2% at 10 kHz, but 60% at 100 kHz. The application of the active-shielding technique significantly reduces such errors, although an additional OA is required to drive the cable shield. For instance, under the same conditions indicated before, the resulting error is around 0.01% at 10 kHz and 1% at 100 kHz. Therefore, for scenarios with long interconnecting cables requiring high operating frequencies, the application of active shielding seems to be really necessary to avoid large measuring errors.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementVol. 74
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Biochemistry Research Institute of La Plata (AR), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (AR), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.