To Combine or Not to Combine? The Influence of Combining Training Datasets on the Robustness of Deep Learning Models: An Analysis for Optical Character Recognition of Handwriting

The present manuscript addresses the question of how training data should be sampled for deep learning models by analyzing and evaluating the impact of training data representation and complexity on the performance and robustness of deep learning models. To address this open question, we take a combinatorial approach and train three architecturally identical deep learning models on three combinations of handwritten digit datasets of varying complexity: EMNIST Digits, DIDA, and a newly composed third dataset combining the first two datasets. Each model was evaluated using withheld test data from all three datasets. We find that models trained exclusively on either EMNIST Digits or DIDA performed well on their respective datasets but poorly on unfamiliar datasets. However, the model trained on both datasets showed an overall solid performance, although not quite reaching the accuracy of the specialized models on their respective datasets. We conclude that while specializing in the training dataset can increase accuracy, a more diverse dataset enhances model robustness. In practice, deep learning models should thus be trained on data that represents the actual application environment as closely as possible or, if such data is not available, on diverse data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3556582
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Combine or Not to Combine? The Influence of Combining Training Datasets on the Robustness of Deep Learning Models: An Analysis for Optical Character Recognition of Handwriting

Ricardo Buettner, Lucas O. Müller, Leopold Fischer-Brandies, Benjamin Rebholz
3 citations
IEEE Access
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
3.83
article

To Combine or Not to Combine? The Influence of Combining Training Datasets on the Robustness of Deep Learning Models: An Analysis for Optical Character Recognition of Handwriting

Ricardo Buettner, Lucas O. Müller, Leopold Fischer-Brandies, Benjamin Rebholz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The present manuscript addresses the question of how training data should be sampled for deep learning models by analyzing and evaluating the impact of training data representation and complexity on the performance and robustness of deep learning models. To address this open question, we take a combinatorial approach and train three architecturally identical deep learning models on three combinations of handwritten digit datasets of varying complexity: EMNIST Digits, DIDA, and a newly composed third dataset combining the first two datasets. Each model was evaluated using withheld test data from all three datasets. We find that models trained exclusively on either EMNIST Digits or DIDA performed well on their respective datasets but poorly on unfamiliar datasets. However, the model trained on both datasets showed an overall solid performance, although not quite reaching the accuracy of the specialized models on their respective datasets. We conclude that while specializing in the training dataset can increase accuracy, a more diverse dataset enhances model robustness. In practice, deep learning models should thus be trained on data that represents the actual application environment as closely as possible or, if such data is not available, on diverse data.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
3.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.