Metrics and Algorithms for Identifying and Mitigating Bias in AI Design: A Counterfactual Fairness Approach

The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized industries such as healthcare, finance, and education. However, these advancements have also intensified ethical concerns regarding bias, fairness, and accountability in AI systems. Traditional fairness evaluation methods primarily focus on dataset-level biases, overlooking biases arising from model decision-making processes. This study introduces a novel framework for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating biases in AI models using counterfactual fairness, a robust approach that simulates alternative outcomes to minimize discriminatory effects. The proposed methodology integrates fairness-aware data preprocessing, feature selection, and model optimization strategies, ensuring equitable treatment across demographic groups. To validate the framework, we conducted empirical experiments using random forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting models on the xAPI-Edu-Data dataset. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in demographic parity and equal opportunity fairness metrics while maintaining high predictive performance. Furthermore, comparative analysis with existing bias mitigation techniques confirms that our approach effectively reduces bias propagation in AI decision-making processes. By incorporating counterfactual fairness into AI design, this study provides a scalable and adaptable solution for ensuring ethical AI deployments aligned with regulatory standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3556082
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metrics and Algorithms for Identifying and Mitigating Bias in AI Design: A Counterfactual Fairness Approach

Seongjin Ahn, D. H. Moon
3 citations
IEEE Access
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
article

Metrics and Algorithms for Identifying and Mitigating Bias in AI Design: A Counterfactual Fairness Approach

Seongjin Ahn, D. H. Moon
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized industries such as healthcare, finance, and education. However, these advancements have also intensified ethical concerns regarding bias, fairness, and accountability in AI systems. Traditional fairness evaluation methods primarily focus on dataset-level biases, overlooking biases arising from model decision-making processes. This study introduces a novel framework for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating biases in AI models using counterfactual fairness, a robust approach that simulates alternative outcomes to minimize discriminatory effects. The proposed methodology integrates fairness-aware data preprocessing, feature selection, and model optimization strategies, ensuring equitable treatment across demographic groups. To validate the framework, we conducted empirical experiments using random forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting models on the xAPI-Edu-Data dataset. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in demographic parity and equal opportunity fairness metrics while maintaining high predictive performance. Furthermore, comparative analysis with existing bias mitigation techniques confirms that our approach effectively reduces bias propagation in AI decision-making processes. By incorporating counterfactual fairness into AI design, this study provides a scalable and adaptable solution for ensuring ethical AI deployments aligned with regulatory standards.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.