Applying 7 Failure Modes and STPA on Autonomous Systems: A Comparative Study

Safety analysis of modern autonomous systems is complex due to evolving software components and intricate hardware interactions. Traditional safety techniques like FMEA and FTA are not designed to cope with the new challenges raised by autonomous systems, e.g., their risk evaluation procedures cannot be used for the AI algorithms the systems are built on. In this paper, we report on promising safety analysis techniques, such as Seven Failure Modes (7FM) and Systems Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA). We compare 7FM and STPA, focusing on their ability to address complex system interactions and component-based failures. Our study examines a use case involving autonomous vehicle components to determine the effectiveness of each method in identifying and mitigating safety risks. Both techniques offer structured guidance for safety analysis but vary in approach and application. Our concluding remarks underscore the importance of integrating these methodologies for effective hazard analysis. We also discuss challenges encountered during the study, proposing improvements and future work to refine the safety analysis process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icsrs63046.2024.10927525
Primary Topic
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying 7 Failure Modes and STPA on Autonomous Systems: A Comparative Study

Morayo Adedjouma, Walid Bennaceur
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
article

Applying 7 Failure Modes and STPA on Autonomous Systems: A Comparative Study

Morayo Adedjouma, Walid Bennaceur
article en

Abstract

Safety analysis of modern autonomous systems is complex due to evolving software components and intricate hardware interactions. Traditional safety techniques like FMEA and FTA are not designed to cope with the new challenges raised by autonomous systems, e.g., their risk evaluation procedures cannot be used for the AI algorithms the systems are built on. In this paper, we report on promising safety analysis techniques, such as Seven Failure Modes (7FM) and Systems Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA). We compare 7FM and STPA, focusing on their ability to address complex system interactions and component-based failures. Our study examines a use case involving autonomous vehicle components to determine the effectiveness of each method in identifying and mitigating safety risks. Both techniques offer structured guidance for safety analysis but vary in approach and application. Our concluding remarks underscore the importance of integrating these methodologies for effective hazard analysis. We also discuss challenges encountered during the study, proposing improvements and future work to refine the safety analysis process.

Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.