Anesthetic effect of articaine and lidocaine in tooth extraction
The safety and efficiency of 4% articaine compared to 2% lidocaine for tooth extraction is of interest to dentists. Hence, a total of 30 patients requiring premolar tooth extraction for orthodontics reason were randomly divided into 2 groups namely (1) articaine and (2) lidocaine. Parameters such as onset of action, duration of anaesthesia and need to re-anesthetize at the surgical zone are evaluated. Pain evaluation was done with visual analog scale (VAS). Data shows that 4% articaine had a shorter onset of action and longer duration of anaesthesia compared to lidocaine.
Authors
- T Santosh
- S. K. Patra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4616-5794)
- Vaibhav Awinashe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3470-2978)
- Archana Misurya
- Abhigyan Manas
- TR Prasanna
- Savita Singh
- K N Jagadeesh
Institutions
- Qassim University (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bioinformation
- Published
- 2025-03-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300210297
- Primary Topic
- Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00