Integrating ecosystem service losses into life cycle assessment on the treatment of 40 categories of hazardous waste: A China case study

• Lifecycle impacts of the hazardous waste treatment plant predominantly arise from the operation stage. • Incineration process results in the largest environmental impacts, while rapid landfill is the least. • Cultural and regular services are the most significant losses of ecosystem services within hazardous waste treatment. • Proposes an evaluation framework integrating ecosystem service loss indicators and expanding lifecycle boundaries. The 16th Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention indicated the need to manage hazardous waste using a life cycle approach to control environmental impacts. However, the environmental impacts of hazardous waste treatment have not yet been adequately assessed, particularly regarding the lack of an evaluation framework for the impacts on ecosystem services. This study employs a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework integrating ecosystem service losses, to assess the environmental impacts of a case hazardous waste treatment plant in southwest China. The results show that in the lifecycle stages of hazardous waste treatment, the operation stage has the largest environmental impact. Among the different treatment processes, incineration has the largest environmental impact, while rigid landfilling has the lowest. Besides, the losses of the treatment of hazardous waste on ecosystem services are 77.12 yuan per ton, accounting for approximately 6.43% to 38.56% of the treatment costs. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis demonstrate the robustness of the results. Finally, the implications including expanding the LCA boundaries of hazardous waste treatment, ecological compensation for ecosystem service losses, and co-regulations of multiple departments for hazardous waste treatment are proposed. This study proposes a new indicator for assessing the ecosystem service losses within the LCA of hazardous waste treatment and offers the government and the public a quantification of the ecological costs associated with hazardous waste treatment, provides the basis of lifecycle environmental impacts after product decommissioning for trade negotiations, and makes inventory data available for hazardous waste treatment processes during the whole lifecycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113401
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating ecosystem service losses into life cycle assessment on the treatment of 40 categories of hazardous waste: A China case study

Ran Fang, Wei Xiao, Li Zeng, Xincong Liu et al.
3 citations
Ecological Indicators
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
12.60
article

Integrating ecosystem service losses into life cycle assessment on the treatment of 40 categories of hazardous waste: A China case study

Ran Fang, Wei Xiao, Li Zeng, Xincong Liu, Mengdi Zhang, Wenyue Hou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Lifecycle impacts of the hazardous waste treatment plant predominantly arise from the operation stage. • Incineration process results in the largest environmental impacts, while rapid landfill is the least. • Cultural and regular services are the most significant losses of ecosystem services within hazardous waste treatment. • Proposes an evaluation framework integrating ecosystem service loss indicators and expanding lifecycle boundaries. The 16th Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention indicated the need to manage hazardous waste using a life cycle approach to control environmental impacts. However, the environmental impacts of hazardous waste treatment have not yet been adequately assessed, particularly regarding the lack of an evaluation framework for the impacts on ecosystem services. This study employs a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework integrating ecosystem service losses, to assess the environmental impacts of a case hazardous waste treatment plant in southwest China. The results show that in the lifecycle stages of hazardous waste treatment, the operation stage has the largest environmental impact. Among the different treatment processes, incineration has the largest environmental impact, while rigid landfilling has the lowest. Besides, the losses of the treatment of hazardous waste on ecosystem services are 77.12 yuan per ton, accounting for approximately 6.43% to 38.56% of the treatment costs. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis demonstrate the robustness of the results. Finally, the implications including expanding the LCA boundaries of hazardous waste treatment, ecological compensation for ecosystem service losses, and co-regulations of multiple departments for hazardous waste treatment are proposed. This study proposes a new indicator for assessing the ecosystem service losses within the LCA of hazardous waste treatment and offers the government and the public a quantification of the ecological costs associated with hazardous waste treatment, provides the basis of lifecycle environmental impacts after product decommissioning for trade negotiations, and makes inventory data available for hazardous waste treatment processes during the whole lifecycle.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 173
Xihua University (CN), Chengdu University of Technology (CN), Chengdu University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.