Validating new limits for human thermoregulation

Recent projections suggest that large geographical areas will soon experience heat and humidity exceeding limits for human thermoregulation. The survivability limits modeled in that research were based on laboratory studies suggesting that humans cannot effectively thermoregulate in wet bulb temperatures (T<sub>wb</sub>) above 26 to 31 °C, values considerably lower than the widely publicized theoretical threshold of 35 °C. The newly proposed empirical limits were derived from the T<sub>wb</sub> corresponding to the core temperature inflection point in participants exposed to stepped increases in air temperature or relative humidity in a climate-controlled chamber. Despite the increasing use of these thermal-step protocols, their validity has not been established. We used a humidity-step protocol to estimate the T<sub>wb</sub> threshold for core temperature inflection in 12 volunteers. To determine whether this threshold truly demarcates the T<sub>wb</sub> above which thermoregulation is impossible, each participant was subsequently exposed to T<sub>wb</sub> above (~33.7 °C, T<sub>above</sub>) and below (~30.9 °C, T<sub>below</sub>) their respective inflection point (~32.3 °C, T<sub>wb</sub>) for up to 9 h (in random order). Core temperature rose continuously in T<sub>above</sub>. It was projected that core temperatures associated with heat stroke (40.2 °C) would occur within 10 h. While T<sub>below</sub> was also uncompensable, the core temperature rate of rise was considerably lower than in T<sub>above</sub> such that it would take >24 h to reach 40.2 °C. Our study supports thermal-step protocols as an effective technique for evaluating survivability limits for heat exposure and provides a direct assessment of the limits of human thermoregulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421281122
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating new limits for human thermoregulation

Robert D. Meade, Glen Patrick Kenny, Emily J. Tetzlaff, Brodie J. Richards et al.
9 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Climate Change and Health Impacts
10.80
article

Validating new limits for human thermoregulation

Robert D. Meade, Glen Patrick Kenny, Emily J. Tetzlaff, Brodie J. Richards, Fergus K. O’Connor, James J. McCormick, Katie E. Wagar, Theodore Egube, Roberto C. Harris‐Mostert
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Recent projections suggest that large geographical areas will soon experience heat and humidity exceeding limits for human thermoregulation. The survivability limits modeled in that research were based on laboratory studies suggesting that humans cannot effectively thermoregulate in wet bulb temperatures (T<sub>wb</sub>) above 26 to 31 °C, values considerably lower than the widely publicized theoretical threshold of 35 °C. The newly proposed empirical limits were derived from the T<sub>wb</sub> corresponding to the core temperature inflection point in participants exposed to stepped increases in air temperature or relative humidity in a climate-controlled chamber. Despite the increasing use of these thermal-step protocols, their validity has not been established. We used a humidity-step protocol to estimate the T<sub>wb</sub> threshold for core temperature inflection in 12 volunteers. To determine whether this threshold truly demarcates the T<sub>wb</sub> above which thermoregulation is impossible, each participant was subsequently exposed to T<sub>wb</sub> above (~33.7 °C, T<sub>above</sub>) and below (~30.9 °C, T<sub>below</sub>) their respective inflection point (~32.3 °C, T<sub>wb</sub>) for up to 9 h (in random order). Core temperature rose continuously in T<sub>above</sub>. It was projected that core temperatures associated with heat stroke (40.2 °C) would occur within 10 h. While T<sub>below</sub> was also uncompensable, the core temperature rate of rise was considerably lower than in T<sub>above</sub> such that it would take >24 h to reach 40.2 °C. Our study supports thermal-step protocols as an effective technique for evaluating survivability limits for heat exposure and provides a direct assessment of the limits of human thermoregulation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(14)
Human Sciences Research Council (ZA), Harvard University (US), University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Mitacs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
10.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.