Learning by writing: The influence of handwriting and typing on novel word learning in typically developing readers and readers with dyslexia

Writing-based spelling is crucial for acquiring written word knowledge, contributing to form lexical representations that integrate motor information. Modern educational settings incorporate multiple modalities, with typing increasingly complementing handwriting. However, evidence on their relative effectiveness in supporting orthographic and semantic learning, particularly when these processes are impaired, remains limited. This study examines the impact of the two writing modalities on the learning of orthographic and semantic information in typically developing (TD) children and those with developmental dyslexia (DD). Eighteen Italian middle school students with DD and eighteen age-matched TD readers participated. Participants learned a set of nonwords, varying in transcription regularity, paired with images, either through typing or handwriting. Their spelling and nonword-image association skills were then tested. Recorded metrics included accuracy, writing duration during learning and spelling tasks, and reaction time in the nonword-image mapping task. TD children benefited from both writing modalities during learning. Crucially, the DD group showed better spelling and nonword-image association performance when learning occurred through typing. Accuracy in retrieving orthographic and semantic information was not significantly affected by the time spent handwriting or typing during learning. Performance differences based on transcription complexity provided insights into the extent to which children internalized lexical representations. Both writing modalities can support orthographic and semantic learning, but the complex graphomotor demands of handwriting may hinder novel word acquisition in dyslexic individuals. Incorporating typing into educational strategies could alleviate the cognitive load associated with handwriting and enhance word retention for these students. • Typing improves spelling recall in dyslexic readers compared to handwriting. • Dyslexic readers show better semantic integration through typing. • Typical readers show orthographic and semantic learning across both writing modalities. • Writing duration during learning does not influence spelling or semantic retrieval. • Dyslexic students struggle with orthographic-motor integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Instruction
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102119
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning by writing: The influence of handwriting and typing on novel word learning in typically developing readers and readers with dyslexia

Tania Cerni, Remo Job, Isabella Lonciari
1 citations
Learning and Instruction
Writing and Handwriting Education
8.93
article

Learning by writing: The influence of handwriting and typing on novel word learning in typically developing readers and readers with dyslexia

Tania Cerni, Remo Job, Isabella Lonciari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Writing-based spelling is crucial for acquiring written word knowledge, contributing to form lexical representations that integrate motor information. Modern educational settings incorporate multiple modalities, with typing increasingly complementing handwriting. However, evidence on their relative effectiveness in supporting orthographic and semantic learning, particularly when these processes are impaired, remains limited. This study examines the impact of the two writing modalities on the learning of orthographic and semantic information in typically developing (TD) children and those with developmental dyslexia (DD). Eighteen Italian middle school students with DD and eighteen age-matched TD readers participated. Participants learned a set of nonwords, varying in transcription regularity, paired with images, either through typing or handwriting. Their spelling and nonword-image association skills were then tested. Recorded metrics included accuracy, writing duration during learning and spelling tasks, and reaction time in the nonword-image mapping task. TD children benefited from both writing modalities during learning. Crucially, the DD group showed better spelling and nonword-image association performance when learning occurred through typing. Accuracy in retrieving orthographic and semantic information was not significantly affected by the time spent handwriting or typing during learning. Performance differences based on transcription complexity provided insights into the extent to which children internalized lexical representations. Both writing modalities can support orthographic and semantic learning, but the complex graphomotor demands of handwriting may hinder novel word acquisition in dyslexic individuals. Incorporating typing into educational strategies could alleviate the cognitive load associated with handwriting and enhance word retention for these students. • Typing improves spelling recall in dyslexic readers compared to handwriting. • Dyslexic readers show better semantic integration through typing. • Typical readers show orthographic and semantic learning across both writing modalities. • Writing duration during learning does not influence spelling or semantic retrieval. • Dyslexic students struggle with orthographic-motor integration.

Learning and InstructionVol. 98
University of Trento (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems (IT), Fondazione Vincenzo Pansadoro (IT)
Stiftelsen Promobilia, Fondazione Cassa Di Risparmio Di Trento E Rovereto
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Writing and Handwriting Education
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.