Atmospheric Aerosols Versus Total Atmospheric Deposition in Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles): Composition, Concentration, and Flux

Abstract Atmospheric mineral dust deposition is an important source of nutrients for ocean and tropical island ecosystems. Direct deposition measurements are generally more reliable at local scale than dust deposition models, even those based on aerosol concentration measurements. Whatever the scale, relevant local observations are necessary for model evaluation. We present here the results obtained by direct measurement of atmospheric aerosols and total atmospheric deposition using a 14‐month time series from the Caribbean region. Total deposition velocity, lifetime, and scavenging ratio of major and trace elements were determined. Comparing total deposition fluxes of aluminum (dust proxy) and sea‐salt sodium (sea‐salt proxy) with Community Atmosphere Model (CAM6) outputs shows that the modeled total deposition rate is underestimated by a factor of two for dust and by a factor of eight for sea salt, while model aerosol concentration is larger than concentration measured near ground level. This result is due to wet deposition being underestimated in the model. The scavenging ratio (w/w) of Saharan dust elements ranges from 95 to 1,390, with a median of 530, close to the geometric mean value of 513. Sea salt presents a greater range of scavenging ratio values, from 325 to 2,355, with a median of 1,180, close to the geometric mean value of 1,030. The lead isotope ratio 206 Pb/ 207 Pb clearly highlights differences in lead origin between aerosols and deposits, revealing that aerosol samples are enriched by anthropogenic sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042682
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atmospheric Aerosols Versus Total Atmospheric Deposition in Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles): Composition, Concentration, and Flux

R. Losno, C. Dessert, N. M. Mahowald, Yangjunjie Xu‐Yang et al.
2 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
2.60
article

Atmospheric Aerosols Versus Total Atmospheric Deposition in Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles): Composition, Concentration, and Flux

R. Losno, C. Dessert, N. M. Mahowald, Yangjunjie Xu‐Yang, Fabrice Monna, Mickaël Tharaud
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Atmospheric mineral dust deposition is an important source of nutrients for ocean and tropical island ecosystems. Direct deposition measurements are generally more reliable at local scale than dust deposition models, even those based on aerosol concentration measurements. Whatever the scale, relevant local observations are necessary for model evaluation. We present here the results obtained by direct measurement of atmospheric aerosols and total atmospheric deposition using a 14‐month time series from the Caribbean region. Total deposition velocity, lifetime, and scavenging ratio of major and trace elements were determined. Comparing total deposition fluxes of aluminum (dust proxy) and sea‐salt sodium (sea‐salt proxy) with Community Atmosphere Model (CAM6) outputs shows that the modeled total deposition rate is underestimated by a factor of two for dust and by a factor of eight for sea salt, while model aerosol concentration is larger than concentration measured near ground level. This result is due to wet deposition being underestimated in the model. The scavenging ratio (w/w) of Saharan dust elements ranges from 95 to 1,390, with a median of 530, close to the geometric mean value of 513. Sea salt presents a greater range of scavenging ratio values, from 325 to 2,355, with a median of 1,180, close to the geometric mean value of 1,030. The lead isotope ratio 206 Pb/ 207 Pb clearly highlights differences in lead origin between aerosols and deposits, revealing that aerosol samples are enriched by anthropogenic sources.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(7)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR), Université de Bourgogne (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Cornell University (US), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR)
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.