Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Vietnam: Insights from the Chevron Doctrine

Judicial review of administrative decisions is a crucial mechanism for ensuring the rule of law in state management. In the context of building a socialist rule of law state, Vietnam faces significant challenges in determining the scope and extent of judicial intervention in administrative decisions. The formation, development, and termination of the Chevron doctrine in the United States provides valuable experiences on balancing respect for administrative expertise with effective judicial review. This study analyzes the core principles of the Chevron doctrine to draw insights for improving Vietnam's judicial review mechanism, focusing on three aspects: recognizing and controlling administrative discretion; achieving a reasonable balance between the expertise of administrative agencies and the effectiveness of judicial review by the courts; expanding the scope of judicial review. In doing so, the study contributes to building an effective judicial review mechanism, serving the goal of developing the Vietnamese socialist rule-of-law state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VNU Journal of Science Legal Studies
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4637
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Vietnam: Insights from the Chevron Doctrine

Nguyen Thu Trang
VNU Journal of Science Legal Studies
Legal principles and applications
article

Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Vietnam: Insights from the Chevron Doctrine

Nguyen Thu Trang
article en

Abstract

Judicial review of administrative decisions is a crucial mechanism for ensuring the rule of law in state management. In the context of building a socialist rule of law state, Vietnam faces significant challenges in determining the scope and extent of judicial intervention in administrative decisions. The formation, development, and termination of the Chevron doctrine in the United States provides valuable experiences on balancing respect for administrative expertise with effective judicial review. This study analyzes the core principles of the Chevron doctrine to draw insights for improving Vietnam's judicial review mechanism, focusing on three aspects: recognizing and controlling administrative discretion; achieving a reasonable balance between the expertise of administrative agencies and the effectiveness of judicial review by the courts; expanding the scope of judicial review. In doing so, the study contributes to building an effective judicial review mechanism, serving the goal of developing the Vietnamese socialist rule-of-law state.

VNU Journal of Science Legal StudiesVol. 41(1)
Hanoi Law University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.