thinking with perceptual skills in philosophy for and with children (p4wc)

Starting from Lipman’s interest in acquiring a balance between the cognitive and affective, the conceptual and the perceptual in the practice of P4C, we explore some possibilities of integrating Betty Edwards’s framework for training perceptual skills as a means of enriching the traditional construction of problems in the community of philosophical inquiry (CPI). To do so, we parallel Lipman’s and Sharp’s views on multidimensional thinking with insights from embodied learning and philosophizing, from the use of gestures, artistic illustrations, and drama, to drawing in the curriculum, in order to suggest ways of enriching discussion plans in the CPI. Often, the compatibility between the multidimensional thinking approach in P4C and a more experiential and embodied learning is natural: for example, caring thinking, which entails developing moral attitudes and a relational consciousness may need more attention to children’s expression of emotions, and mobilize more stimuli to complement the traditional dialogue. The interdependence between problematization, creativity and affectivity can also be illustrated with insights from Betty Edwards’s training perceptual skills’ method: our focus is to use the method as a resource for the development of philosophical problems in the CPI. We argue that, in addition to building a better relationship with one’s creativity, learning to see better may translate into better understanding the process of constructing philosophical problems, and, inspired by the specific perception skills developed by the method, we may add a more relational and situated framework for philosophical questioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
childhood & philosophy
Published
2025-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2025.89060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

thinking with perceptual skills in philosophy for and with children (p4wc)

Ileana Dascălu, Anda Fournel
1 citations
childhood & philosophy
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
article

thinking with perceptual skills in philosophy for and with children (p4wc)

Ileana Dascălu, Anda Fournel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Starting from Lipman’s interest in acquiring a balance between the cognitive and affective, the conceptual and the perceptual in the practice of P4C, we explore some possibilities of integrating Betty Edwards’s framework for training perceptual skills as a means of enriching the traditional construction of problems in the community of philosophical inquiry (CPI). To do so, we parallel Lipman’s and Sharp’s views on multidimensional thinking with insights from embodied learning and philosophizing, from the use of gestures, artistic illustrations, and drama, to drawing in the curriculum, in order to suggest ways of enriching discussion plans in the CPI. Often, the compatibility between the multidimensional thinking approach in P4C and a more experiential and embodied learning is natural: for example, caring thinking, which entails developing moral attitudes and a relational consciousness may need more attention to children’s expression of emotions, and mobilize more stimuli to complement the traditional dialogue. The interdependence between problematization, creativity and affectivity can also be illustrated with insights from Betty Edwards’s training perceptual skills’ method: our focus is to use the method as a resource for the development of philosophical problems in the CPI. We argue that, in addition to building a better relationship with one’s creativity, learning to see better may translate into better understanding the process of constructing philosophical problems, and, inspired by the specific perception skills developed by the method, we may add a more relational and situated framework for philosophical questioning.

childhood & philosophyVol. 21
University of Bucharest (RO), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.