“I Wear Combat Boots on My Tongue”: Quantitative Discourse Analysis of Stance Taking and Evaluation in The Radical Right Media

Contemporary research on the far right has often discounted the informal grassroot components and the individual motivations that draw people toward the extremist ideological components of this political current. This article quantitatively explores evaluations and stance expressions in the caller section of The Savage Nation, a popular conservative radio show. We randomly selected 106 conversations from 37 shows that aired in August and September 2018 and from March to June 2020. We manually extracted and annotated for the type of evaluation produced using a mixed methodology. A random forest analysis to the resulting dataset shows that both the callers and the hosts have departed from the “old racism” model to instead target opposing ideologies as proxy, dynamically construe the American society in a dichotomous frame that distinguishes between the “pure” and the “corrupt,” and do so in a paranoid style ripe with oversuspicion and overaggressiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jrds-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Wear Combat Boots on My Tongue”: Quantitative Discourse Analysis of Stance Taking and Evaluation in The Radical Right Media

Chadi Ben Youssef, A De La Fuente
1 links
Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

“I Wear Combat Boots on My Tongue”: Quantitative Discourse Analysis of Stance Taking and Evaluation in The Radical Right Media

Chadi Ben Youssef, A De La Fuente
article en

Abstract

Contemporary research on the far right has often discounted the informal grassroot components and the individual motivations that draw people toward the extremist ideological components of this political current. This article quantitatively explores evaluations and stance expressions in the caller section of The Savage Nation, a popular conservative radio show. We randomly selected 106 conversations from 37 shows that aired in August and September 2018 and from March to June 2020. We manually extracted and annotated for the type of evaluation produced using a mixed methodology. A random forest analysis to the resulting dataset shows that both the callers and the hosts have departed from the “old racism” model to instead target opposing ideologies as proxy, dynamically construe the American society in a dichotomous frame that distinguishes between the “pure” and the “corrupt,” and do so in a paranoid style ripe with oversuspicion and overaggressiveness.

Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication ScienceVol. 7(2)
University of Neuchâtel (CH), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.