Optimization of Synergy Among Granulated Blast Furnace Slag, Magnesium Oxide, and Basalt Fiber for the Solidification of Soft Clay

In order to reuse granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and low-strength soft clay (SC), this study developed a curing material using magnesium oxide (MgO) as an alkali activator to excite the GBFS and basalt fiber (BF) as reinforcing material to prepare the SC. The mixing ranges of GBFS, MgO, and BF were established as 9.48%~14.52%, 0.48%~5.52%, and 0%~1.00454% of the dry clay mass, respectively, and the mixing ratios of the three were optimized using the central composite design (CCD) test. Through the analysis of variance, factor interaction analysis, and parameter optimization of the CCD test, the optimal mass ratio of GBFS, MgO, and BF was determined to be 13.35:4.47:0.26. The curing material of this ratio was named GMBF and mixed with SC to prepare GMBF solidified clay. An equal amount of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was taken and formed with SC to form OPC solidified clay. The mechanical properties, durability, and hydration products of GMBF solidified clay were clarified by the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test, freeze-thaw cycle test, X-ray diffraction (XRD) test, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) test. The UCS of the GMBF solidified clay was 1.08 MPa and 2.85 MPa at 7 and 91 days, respectively, which was 45.9% and 33.8% higher than that of the OPC solidified clay (0.74 MPa and 2.13 MPa) at the same curing time. After ten freeze-thaw cycles, the UCS of GMBF and OPC solidified clay decreased from the initial 2.85 MPa and 2.13 MPa to 1.59 MPa and 0.7 MPa, respectively, with decreases of 44.2% and 67.1%, respectively. By XRD and SEM, the hydration products of GMBF solidified clay were mainly calcium silicate hydrate gel and hydrotalcite. The interface bonding and bridging effect formed between BF and SC or hydration products, indicating that these interactions contributed to the solidified clay enhanced structural integrity. This study demonstrates that the CCD approach provides solution for recycling SC and GBFS. Laboratory tests confirm the potential of the optimized GMBF formulation for practical engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071577
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Synergy Among Granulated Blast Furnace Slag, Magnesium Oxide, and Basalt Fiber for the Solidification of Soft Clay

Ho‐Il Ji, Xiang Fan, Fan Ding
Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Optimization of Synergy Among Granulated Blast Furnace Slag, Magnesium Oxide, and Basalt Fiber for the Solidification of Soft Clay

Ho‐Il Ji, Xiang Fan, Fan Ding
article en

Abstract

In order to reuse granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) and low-strength soft clay (SC), this study developed a curing material using magnesium oxide (MgO) as an alkali activator to excite the GBFS and basalt fiber (BF) as reinforcing material to prepare the SC. The mixing ranges of GBFS, MgO, and BF were established as 9.48%~14.52%, 0.48%~5.52%, and 0%~1.00454% of the dry clay mass, respectively, and the mixing ratios of the three were optimized using the central composite design (CCD) test. Through the analysis of variance, factor interaction analysis, and parameter optimization of the CCD test, the optimal mass ratio of GBFS, MgO, and BF was determined to be 13.35:4.47:0.26. The curing material of this ratio was named GMBF and mixed with SC to prepare GMBF solidified clay. An equal amount of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was taken and formed with SC to form OPC solidified clay. The mechanical properties, durability, and hydration products of GMBF solidified clay were clarified by the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test, freeze-thaw cycle test, X-ray diffraction (XRD) test, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) test. The UCS of the GMBF solidified clay was 1.08 MPa and 2.85 MPa at 7 and 91 days, respectively, which was 45.9% and 33.8% higher than that of the OPC solidified clay (0.74 MPa and 2.13 MPa) at the same curing time. After ten freeze-thaw cycles, the UCS of GMBF and OPC solidified clay decreased from the initial 2.85 MPa and 2.13 MPa to 1.59 MPa and 0.7 MPa, respectively, with decreases of 44.2% and 67.1%, respectively. By XRD and SEM, the hydration products of GMBF solidified clay were mainly calcium silicate hydrate gel and hydrotalcite. The interface bonding and bridging effect formed between BF and SC or hydration products, indicating that these interactions contributed to the solidified clay enhanced structural integrity. This study demonstrates that the CCD approach provides solution for recycling SC and GBFS. Laboratory tests confirm the potential of the optimized GMBF formulation for practical engineering applications.

MaterialsVol. 18(7)
Chang'an University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.