What can lithics tell us about technological complexity? Reflections on and around the Hoabinhian phenomenon in the cobble world

Abstract For a long time, scientific discussions of the behavioral, technological, cultural, and cognitive complexity of Homo sapiens have been Europe‐ and Africa‐centered for their abundant archaeological discoveries related to behavioral modernity and cultural diversity of H. sapiens . However, the techno‐cultural complexity of H. sapiens is still poorly understood in southern China and mainland Southeast Asia. In the East, the Paleolithic industries are famous for the long‐lasting cobble‐tool industry, also called “chopper‐chopping tool tradition” by Hallam L. Movius in the 1940s. Under this historical recognition, which is still widely accepted, it seems that no evident technological changes could be identified in the Paleolithic industries. In this paper, we take the Hoabinhian phenomenon as an example to question the idea of using terms like simplicity, archaism, and crudeness to describe the stone tools and paleo‐cultures born in the cobble world, and also discuss the behavioral and technological complexity of Hoabinhian hunter‐gatherers seen in and beyond stone tools. We conclude that more integrative studies should be conducted on stone artifacts to deepen our understanding of the complexity of the Hoabinhian and other phenomena represented by the simple‐looking technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeometry
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.13086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What can lithics tell us about technological complexity? Reflections on and around the Hoabinhian phenomenon in the cobble world

Hubert Forestier, Xinzheng Lan, Ruxi Yang, Kaiwei Qiu et al.
1 citations
Archaeometry
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
1.15
article

What can lithics tell us about technological complexity? Reflections on and around the Hoabinhian phenomenon in the cobble world

Hubert Forestier, Xinzheng Lan, Ruxi Yang, Kaiwei Qiu, Yuanjin Jiang, Zixuan Shen, Yuduan Zhou, Heng Sophady
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract For a long time, scientific discussions of the behavioral, technological, cultural, and cognitive complexity of Homo sapiens have been Europe‐ and Africa‐centered for their abundant archaeological discoveries related to behavioral modernity and cultural diversity of H. sapiens . However, the techno‐cultural complexity of H. sapiens is still poorly understood in southern China and mainland Southeast Asia. In the East, the Paleolithic industries are famous for the long‐lasting cobble‐tool industry, also called “chopper‐chopping tool tradition” by Hallam L. Movius in the 1940s. Under this historical recognition, which is still widely accepted, it seems that no evident technological changes could be identified in the Paleolithic industries. In this paper, we take the Hoabinhian phenomenon as an example to question the idea of using terms like simplicity, archaism, and crudeness to describe the stone tools and paleo‐cultures born in the cobble world, and also discuss the behavioral and technological complexity of Hoabinhian hunter‐gatherers seen in and beyond stone tools. We conclude that more integrative studies should be conducted on stone artifacts to deepen our understanding of the complexity of the Hoabinhian and other phenomena represented by the simple‐looking technologies.

Archaeometry
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), State Administration of Cultural Heritage (CN), Royal University of Fine Arts (KH), Wuhan University (CN), Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Museum (CN), Wuhan Technology and Business University (CN), Musée de l'Homme (FR)
National Social Science Fund of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.