University Students’ Ecological Footprint and Lifestyle Changes: Awareness vs. Action

A land-grant university in the Southeastern U.S. has integrated sustainability into an environmental science course (ES100, Introduction to Environmental Science). Two assignments—calculating ecological footprints (EF) and designing a Lifestyle Change Project (LCP)—ask students to consider their environmental impact (EF) and make a lifestyle change to reduce their ecological footprints (LCP). However, these two aspects have been evaluated separately, and assessing their connectivity is less explored. Here, we utilized data from the course to (1) assess the size of students’ EFs; (2) identify Lifestyle Change Projects; and (3) evaluate the relationship between EF and their lifestyle changes. Results showed that the average EF was 7.3 global hectares (gha), which is three times higher than the global average of 2.6 gha. Students performed lifestyle changes focusing on shelter (26%), food (15%), mobility (13%), and goods (46%). Generally, students planned to focus their LCP on their highest calculated category for their EF (R2 = 0.88, p < 0.05). Surprisingly, this alignment shifted once students put their LCPs into practice (R2 = 0.44, p < 0.05). Our findings suggest that attitudes toward EF results do not always translate into actual behavioral changes in students’ lifestyles. Our study highlighted the effectiveness of the EF calculator as a tool for potentially influencing students’ lifestyle behavior in reducing their ecological footprints, thus enhancing their ecological literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040432
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University Students’ Ecological Footprint and Lifestyle Changes: Awareness vs. Action

Marcelo Ardón, Zakiya H. Leggett, Maricar M. Aguilos, Megan Lupek et al.
2 citations
Education Sciences
Environmental Education and Sustainability
4.84
article

University Students’ Ecological Footprint and Lifestyle Changes: Awareness vs. Action

Marcelo Ardón, Zakiya H. Leggett, Maricar M. Aguilos, Megan Lupek, Steph Jeffries
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A land-grant university in the Southeastern U.S. has integrated sustainability into an environmental science course (ES100, Introduction to Environmental Science). Two assignments—calculating ecological footprints (EF) and designing a Lifestyle Change Project (LCP)—ask students to consider their environmental impact (EF) and make a lifestyle change to reduce their ecological footprints (LCP). However, these two aspects have been evaluated separately, and assessing their connectivity is less explored. Here, we utilized data from the course to (1) assess the size of students’ EFs; (2) identify Lifestyle Change Projects; and (3) evaluate the relationship between EF and their lifestyle changes. Results showed that the average EF was 7.3 global hectares (gha), which is three times higher than the global average of 2.6 gha. Students performed lifestyle changes focusing on shelter (26%), food (15%), mobility (13%), and goods (46%). Generally, students planned to focus their LCP on their highest calculated category for their EF (R2 = 0.88, p < 0.05). Surprisingly, this alignment shifted once students put their LCPs into practice (R2 = 0.44, p < 0.05). Our findings suggest that attitudes toward EF results do not always translate into actual behavioral changes in students’ lifestyles. Our study highlighted the effectiveness of the EF calculator as a tool for potentially influencing students’ lifestyle behavior in reducing their ecological footprints, thus enhancing their ecological literacy.

Education SciencesVol. 15(4)
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.