Evaluating the ability of artificial intelligence chatbots to respond to oral cancer questions: A descriptive study

Background: Individual diagnosed with cancer have excessive informational needs regarding various aspects of their disease. This need pushes them to search for information from multiple sources including Artificial Intelligence chatbots. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of responses of Artificial Intelligence chatbots to questions regarding different aspects of oral cancers. Methods: Nineteen dichotomous (yes/no) questions were posed to 8 different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (Chat GTP 3.5, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Chat GTP alternative, TextCortex, YouChat, and CoPilot). The responses were recorded and compared with the correct answers. Statistical analyses, including independent sample t-tests, were conducted to compare differences in mean scores. Results: Most (n=14, 73.7%), questions were answered correctly, and only 1 (5.3%) question got two incorrect responses. Only 4 (50.0%) AI chatbots answered all questions perfectly, and only one chatbot scored less than 80% for all questions. The combined mean score for the AI chatbots was 18.22 ± 1.3, and the differences in the mean score of responses between the AI chatbots and blueprint were statistically insignificant (p= 0.562). Conclusion: The general accuracy of responses to different oral cancer-related questions raised by the patients was high. However, not all AI chatbots give correct responses to all questions, therefore it is the role of health professionals to ensure that patients are educated well regarding their diseases and cautioned on relying on AI chatbots totally.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Health Trends and Perspectives
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32920/ihtp.v5i1.2308
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the ability of artificial intelligence chatbots to respond to oral cancer questions: A descriptive study

Uchenna Okechi, Karpal Singh Sohal
International Health Trends and Perspectives
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating the ability of artificial intelligence chatbots to respond to oral cancer questions: A descriptive study

Uchenna Okechi, Karpal Singh Sohal
article en

Abstract

Background: Individual diagnosed with cancer have excessive informational needs regarding various aspects of their disease. This need pushes them to search for information from multiple sources including Artificial Intelligence chatbots. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of responses of Artificial Intelligence chatbots to questions regarding different aspects of oral cancers. Methods: Nineteen dichotomous (yes/no) questions were posed to 8 different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (Chat GTP 3.5, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Chat GTP alternative, TextCortex, YouChat, and CoPilot). The responses were recorded and compared with the correct answers. Statistical analyses, including independent sample t-tests, were conducted to compare differences in mean scores. Results: Most (n=14, 73.7%), questions were answered correctly, and only 1 (5.3%) question got two incorrect responses. Only 4 (50.0%) AI chatbots answered all questions perfectly, and only one chatbot scored less than 80% for all questions. The combined mean score for the AI chatbots was 18.22 ± 1.3, and the differences in the mean score of responses between the AI chatbots and blueprint were statistically insignificant (p= 0.562). Conclusion: The general accuracy of responses to different oral cancer-related questions raised by the patients was high. However, not all AI chatbots give correct responses to all questions, therefore it is the role of health professionals to ensure that patients are educated well regarding their diseases and cautioned on relying on AI chatbots totally.

International Health Trends and PerspectivesVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the ability of artificial intelligence chatbots to respond to oral cancer questions: A descriptive study — Uchenna Okechi, Karpal Singh Sohal · International Health Trends and Perspectives (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS