Understanding the cognitive reasons why household members participate in household decision-making

Purpose This paper aims to understand why for which products and services individuals engage in household decision-making of the shared households they are part of. Identifying why individuals influence the underlying decision-making is important to best understand and influence household consumer decisions efficiently. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a quantitative study with 523 individuals living in shared households, using the reasoned action approach (RAA) to target different types of products and services. Findings The results show that perceived behavioural control has the highest explanatory power overall, but the results differ between products and services. Research limitations/implications The authors contribute to household decision-making theory by highlighting the helpful role of the RAA and providing empirical evidence from any type of household constellation. The findings allow us to understand better who is driving group decision-making on a household level and why this occurs. Practical implications Companies can use the results to understand better whom to target to position their products and services with different strategies for product design and marketing better. Social implications Governmental institutions can use the results to better understand whom to target to efficiently address households via influential individuals, e.g. for healthy product campaigns. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to provide insights into the cognitive reasons for heterogeneous household members’ participation in household decision-making within a cultural setting of future-oriented performance individualists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bl-07-2024-0087
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the cognitive reasons why household members participate in household decision-making

Michael Leyer, Barbara Freytag-Leyer
The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Understanding the cognitive reasons why household members participate in household decision-making

Michael Leyer, Barbara Freytag-Leyer
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to understand why for which products and services individuals engage in household decision-making of the shared households they are part of. Identifying why individuals influence the underlying decision-making is important to best understand and influence household consumer decisions efficiently. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a quantitative study with 523 individuals living in shared households, using the reasoned action approach (RAA) to target different types of products and services. Findings The results show that perceived behavioural control has the highest explanatory power overall, but the results differ between products and services. Research limitations/implications The authors contribute to household decision-making theory by highlighting the helpful role of the RAA and providing empirical evidence from any type of household constellation. The findings allow us to understand better who is driving group decision-making on a household level and why this occurs. Practical implications Companies can use the results to understand better whom to target to position their products and services with different strategies for product design and marketing better. Social implications Governmental institutions can use the results to better understand whom to target to efficiently address households via influential individuals, e.g. for healthy product campaigns. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to provide insights into the cognitive reasons for heterogeneous household members’ participation in household decision-making within a cultural setting of future-oriented performance individualists.

The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Fulda University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.