Effect of Adhesive System on Bond Strength of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)

It is uncertain whether the interchangeable use of two adhesive systems would yield comparable shear bond strength (SBS) for both Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK); investigating this was the main objective of this study. Milled PEEK (Bredent, Senden, Germany) and PEKK (Pekkton Ivory, AnaxDent, Stuttgart, Germany) blocks were prepared with standardized roughness (0.20 μm) and randomly assigned into two groups (n = 72): with and without aluminum oxide air abrasion (AquaCare Twin, Medivance Instruments, London, UK). Two adhesive systems (Visio.link, Bredent, Senden, Germany, or PEKKBond, AnaxDent, Stuttgart, Germany) were randomly applied (n = 36). Flowable gingival composite (AnaxGum Gingiva, AnaxDent, Stuttgart, Germany) was bonded, and the samples were stored in water (37 °C, 24 h). SBS was measured (MPa) and data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). All main effects and interactions were significant (p < 0.05), except for polymer (p = 0.163) and the triple interaction (p = 0.601). In the PEEK group, Visiolink showed higher SBS (p < 0.001), regardless of prior air abrasion. For the PEKK group, PEKKBond significantly increased SBS values (p < 0.001) for both pre-treatment groups. Previous air abrasion only significantly increased the SBS of controls without adhesive. This study highlights the importance of material-specific adhesive selection, rather than interchangeable use, for optimal results. The bond strength of PEEK and PEKK is influenced by the adhesive system applied. Moreover, PEKK consistently demonstrated higher SBS values in comparison to PEEK, even without the need for pre-treatment or adhesive conditioning. This characteristic renders PEKK a preferred choice for the fabrication of adhesive restorations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9040165
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Adhesive System on Bond Strength of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)

Thaís Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves, Isabela Reginaldo, Kusai Baroudi, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra et al.
2 citations
Journal of Composites Science
Dental materials and restorations
3.35
article

Effect of Adhesive System on Bond Strength of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)

Thaís Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves, Isabela Reginaldo, Kusai Baroudi, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra, Zuíla Maria Lobato Wanghon, Pedro Jacy Santos Diamantino, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Analucia Gebler Phillippi, Fernando Cabral, Mariana Gadelho Gimenez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

It is uncertain whether the interchangeable use of two adhesive systems would yield comparable shear bond strength (SBS) for both Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK); investigating this was the main objective of this study. Milled PEEK (Bredent, Senden, Germany) and PEKK (Pekkton Ivory, AnaxDent, Stuttgart, Germany) blocks were prepared with standardized roughness (0.20 μm) and randomly assigned into two groups (n = 72): with and without aluminum oxide air abrasion (AquaCare Twin, Medivance Instruments, London, UK). Two adhesive systems (Visio.link, Bredent, Senden, Germany, or PEKKBond, AnaxDent, Stuttgart, Germany) were randomly applied (n = 36). Flowable gingival composite (AnaxGum Gingiva, AnaxDent, Stuttgart, Germany) was bonded, and the samples were stored in water (37 °C, 24 h). SBS was measured (MPa) and data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). All main effects and interactions were significant (p < 0.05), except for polymer (p = 0.163) and the triple interaction (p = 0.601). In the PEEK group, Visiolink showed higher SBS (p < 0.001), regardless of prior air abrasion. For the PEKK group, PEKKBond significantly increased SBS values (p < 0.001) for both pre-treatment groups. Previous air abrasion only significantly increased the SBS of controls without adhesive. This study highlights the importance of material-specific adhesive selection, rather than interchangeable use, for optimal results. The bond strength of PEEK and PEKK is influenced by the adhesive system applied. Moreover, PEKK consistently demonstrated higher SBS values in comparison to PEEK, even without the need for pre-treatment or adhesive conditioning. This characteristic renders PEKK a preferred choice for the fabrication of adhesive restorations.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 9(4)
Universidade de Taubaté (BR), Ajman University (AE), Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dental materials and restorations
3.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.