To Stitch or Not to Stitch, That Is the Question: Multi-Gaze Eye Topography Stitching Versus Single-Shot Profilometry

Purpose: To evaluate whether corneal topography map stitching can fully substitute the traditional single-shot capture methods in clinical settings. Methods: This record review study involved the measurement of corneal surfaces from 38 healthy subjects using two instruments: the Medmont Meridia, which employs a stitching composite topography method, and the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP), a single-shot measurement device. Data were processed separately for right and left eyes, with multiple gaze directions captured by the Medmont device. Surface registration and geometric transformation estimation, including neighbouring cubic interpolation, were applied to assess the accuracy of stitched maps compared to single-shot measurements. Results: The study evaluated eye rotation angles and surface alignment between Medmont topography across various gaze directions and ESP scans. Close eye rotations were found in the right-gaze, left-gaze and up-gaze directions, with rotation angles of around 8°; however, the down-gaze angle was around 15°, almost twice other gaze rotation angles. Root mean squared error (RMSE) analysis revealed notable discrepancies, particularly in the right-, left-, and up-gaze directions, with errors reaching up to 98 µm compared to ESP scans. Additionally, significance analyses showed that surface area ratios highlighted considerable differences, especially in the up-gaze direction, where discrepancies reached 70% for both right and left eyes. Conclusions: Despite potential benefits, the findings highlight a significant mismatch between stitched and single-shot measured surfaces due to digital processing artefacts. Findings suggest that stitching techniques, in their current form, are not yet ready to substitute single-shot topography measurements fully. Although stitching helps fit large-diameter contact lenses, care should be taken regarding the central area, especially if utilising the stitched data for optimising optics or wavefront analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Photonics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12040318
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Stitch or Not to Stitch, That Is the Question: Multi-Gaze Eye Topography Stitching Versus Single-Shot Profilometry

Richard Wu, Lynn White, Ahmed Abass, Lo-Yu Wu et al.
1 links
Photonics
Digital Imaging in Medicine
article

To Stitch or Not to Stitch, That Is the Question: Multi-Gaze Eye Topography Stitching Versus Single-Shot Profilometry

Richard Wu, Lynn White, Ahmed Abass, Lo-Yu Wu, Jay Davies, Arwa Fathy, Rami Alanazi, Wei-Ren Lin, Wen-Pin Lin
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether corneal topography map stitching can fully substitute the traditional single-shot capture methods in clinical settings. Methods: This record review study involved the measurement of corneal surfaces from 38 healthy subjects using two instruments: the Medmont Meridia, which employs a stitching composite topography method, and the Eye Surface Profiler (ESP), a single-shot measurement device. Data were processed separately for right and left eyes, with multiple gaze directions captured by the Medmont device. Surface registration and geometric transformation estimation, including neighbouring cubic interpolation, were applied to assess the accuracy of stitched maps compared to single-shot measurements. Results: The study evaluated eye rotation angles and surface alignment between Medmont topography across various gaze directions and ESP scans. Close eye rotations were found in the right-gaze, left-gaze and up-gaze directions, with rotation angles of around 8°; however, the down-gaze angle was around 15°, almost twice other gaze rotation angles. Root mean squared error (RMSE) analysis revealed notable discrepancies, particularly in the right-, left-, and up-gaze directions, with errors reaching up to 98 µm compared to ESP scans. Additionally, significance analyses showed that surface area ratios highlighted considerable differences, especially in the up-gaze direction, where discrepancies reached 70% for both right and left eyes. Conclusions: Despite potential benefits, the findings highlight a significant mismatch between stitched and single-shot measured surfaces due to digital processing artefacts. Findings suggest that stitching techniques, in their current form, are not yet ready to substitute single-shot topography measurements fully. Although stitching helps fit large-diameter contact lenses, care should be taken regarding the central area, especially if utilising the stitched data for optimising optics or wavefront analysis.

PhotonicsVol. 12(4)
Pacific University Oregon (US), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Kang Ning (TW), University of Cambridge (GB), Mackay Medical University (TW), LaVision (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.