The Theological Basis of Interreligious Dialogue in Islam: History and modern Interpretation

The article is devoted to the discourse of interreligious dialogue in Islam, its instrumentalization and interpretation by modern theologians. Examining the precedents of interreligious dialogue in Islam, scholars usually refer to two examples – the Najran and Medina treaties of Muslims with Christians and Jews, and thus confirm the initially pluralistic and tolerant tradition of the Muslim religion. The paper examines the interpretation of these treaties and the use of interreligious dialogue discourses by modern politicians and theologians in Muslim societies: the Tunisian Republic and the United Arab Emirates. The work also shows how the internal resources of the Muslim religion can serve as a means for constructing and forming discourses of interreligious dialogue.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Minbar Islamic Studies
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2025-18-1-142-155
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Theological Basis of Interreligious Dialogue in Islam: History and modern Interpretation

D. R. Gaynetdinov
Minbar Islamic Studies
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

The Theological Basis of Interreligious Dialogue in Islam: History and modern Interpretation

D. R. Gaynetdinov
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the discourse of interreligious dialogue in Islam, its instrumentalization and interpretation by modern theologians. Examining the precedents of interreligious dialogue in Islam, scholars usually refer to two examples – the Najran and Medina treaties of Muslims with Christians and Jews, and thus confirm the initially pluralistic and tolerant tradition of the Muslim religion. The paper examines the interpretation of these treaties and the use of interreligious dialogue discourses by modern politicians and theologians in Muslim societies: the Tunisian Republic and the United Arab Emirates. The work also shows how the internal resources of the Muslim religion can serve as a means for constructing and forming discourses of interreligious dialogue.

Minbar Islamic StudiesVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.