OUTCOMES OF THE STRYKER TRIDENT ‘ALL-POLY’ CEMENTED CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR INSERT IN 252 PATIENTS: A DISTRICT GENERAL EXPERIENCE

Constrained acetabular inserts are designed for revision procedures but increasingly being used for complex primaries. Evidence surrounding their use is limited and concerns linger around their survivorship. We have been cementing this insert directly into the acetabulum for over 15 years and accumulated one of the largest series in the literature. Data was obtained retrospectively from trust NJR records between 20/05/2008 and 23/09/2024. Both primary and revision procedures were included. Routine demographic data, comorbidities and mortality were recorded. Patient records and all pre and post-operative radiographs were studied to identify complications. Patients were subdivided into short, intermediate and long-term follow-up of 2-years, 5-years and 10-years respectively. 252 patients were identified comprising 31.7% (80) male and 68.3% (172) female. Mean age was 79.7 years (47–98). 48.4% (122) were primary constrained THR's and 51.6% (130) were revision. The most common reason for constrained insert in primary cases was a perceived high dislocation risk and for revisions it was recurrent dislocations. 30-day mortality was 1.2% (3) and 1-year mortality was 5.6% (14). 70 patients were within 2-year of surgery. There were 3 complications; periprosthetic fracture (revised to uncemented modular stem), constrained cup pull-out (patient decided against surgery) and ring breakage resulting in head dislocation (died before revision). 77 patients had a minimum follow-up of 2-years. There were 2 complications; constrained cup pull-out (patient decided against surgery) and ring breakage resulting in head dislocation (underwent revision to constrained insert). 68 patients had a minimum follow-up of 5-years. There were 4 complications; 2 ring breakages resulting in head dislocation (one revised to constrained, the other underwent a Girdlestone procedure) and 2 PJI's (underwent two-stage revision). 37 patients had a minimum follow-up of 10-years. There were 3 complications; ring breakage without head dislocation (treated non-operatively) and 2 PJI's (underwent two-stage revision). Our results demonstrate a low overall mechanical complication rate of 3.2% when this constrained insert is cemented directly into the acetabulum without a metal shell, providing a viable option in high-risk primary and revision hip arthroplasty procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.2.060
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OUTCOMES OF THE STRYKER TRIDENT ‘ALL-POLY’ CEMENTED CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR INSERT IN 252 PATIENTS: A DISTRICT GENERAL EXPERIENCE

Benjamin S. Brooke, T. G. McWilliams, Muhammad Saad Azhar, Robert W. Metcalf et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

OUTCOMES OF THE STRYKER TRIDENT ‘ALL-POLY’ CEMENTED CONSTRAINED ACETABULAR INSERT IN 252 PATIENTS: A DISTRICT GENERAL EXPERIENCE

Benjamin S. Brooke, T. G. McWilliams, Muhammad Saad Azhar, Robert W. Metcalf, Adeel Aqil, Sameh Sidhom
article en

Abstract

Constrained acetabular inserts are designed for revision procedures but increasingly being used for complex primaries. Evidence surrounding their use is limited and concerns linger around their survivorship. We have been cementing this insert directly into the acetabulum for over 15 years and accumulated one of the largest series in the literature. Data was obtained retrospectively from trust NJR records between 20/05/2008 and 23/09/2024. Both primary and revision procedures were included. Routine demographic data, comorbidities and mortality were recorded. Patient records and all pre and post-operative radiographs were studied to identify complications. Patients were subdivided into short, intermediate and long-term follow-up of 2-years, 5-years and 10-years respectively. 252 patients were identified comprising 31.7% (80) male and 68.3% (172) female. Mean age was 79.7 years (47–98). 48.4% (122) were primary constrained THR's and 51.6% (130) were revision. The most common reason for constrained insert in primary cases was a perceived high dislocation risk and for revisions it was recurrent dislocations. 30-day mortality was 1.2% (3) and 1-year mortality was 5.6% (14). 70 patients were within 2-year of surgery. There were 3 complications; periprosthetic fracture (revised to uncemented modular stem), constrained cup pull-out (patient decided against surgery) and ring breakage resulting in head dislocation (died before revision). 77 patients had a minimum follow-up of 2-years. There were 2 complications; constrained cup pull-out (patient decided against surgery) and ring breakage resulting in head dislocation (underwent revision to constrained insert). 68 patients had a minimum follow-up of 5-years. There were 4 complications; 2 ring breakages resulting in head dislocation (one revised to constrained, the other underwent a Girdlestone procedure) and 2 PJI's (underwent two-stage revision). 37 patients had a minimum follow-up of 10-years. There were 3 complications; ring breakage without head dislocation (treated non-operatively) and 2 PJI's (underwent two-stage revision). Our results demonstrate a low overall mechanical complication rate of 3.2% when this constrained insert is cemented directly into the acetabulum without a metal shell, providing a viable option in high-risk primary and revision hip arthroplasty procedures.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_2)
Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.