Comparison of Grammar Characteristics of Human-Written Corpora and Machine-Generated Texts Using a Novel Rule-Based Parser

As the prevalence of machine-written texts grows, it has become increasingly important to distinguish between human- and machine-generated content, especially when such texts are not explicitly labeled. Current artificial intelligence (AI) detection methods primarily focus on human-like characteristics, such as emotionality and subjectivity. However, these features can be easily modified through AI humanization, which involves altering word choice. In contrast, altering the underlying grammar without affecting the conveyed information is considerably more challenging. Thus, the grammatical characteristics of a text can be used as additional indicators of its origin. To address this, we employ a newly developed rule-based parser to analyze the grammatical structures in human- and machine-written texts. Our findings reveal systematic grammatical differences between human- and machine-written texts, providing a reliable criterion for the determination of the text origin. We further examine the stability of this criterion in the context of AI humanization and translation to other languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040274
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Grammar Characteristics of Human-Written Corpora and Machine-Generated Texts Using a Novel Rule-Based Parser

Simon Strübbe, Renée Lampe, Irina Sidorenko
Information
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Comparison of Grammar Characteristics of Human-Written Corpora and Machine-Generated Texts Using a Novel Rule-Based Parser

Simon Strübbe, Renée Lampe, Irina Sidorenko
article en

Abstract

As the prevalence of machine-written texts grows, it has become increasingly important to distinguish between human- and machine-generated content, especially when such texts are not explicitly labeled. Current artificial intelligence (AI) detection methods primarily focus on human-like characteristics, such as emotionality and subjectivity. However, these features can be easily modified through AI humanization, which involves altering word choice. In contrast, altering the underlying grammar without affecting the conveyed information is considerably more challenging. Thus, the grammatical characteristics of a text can be used as additional indicators of its origin. To address this, we employ a newly developed rule-based parser to analyze the grammatical structures in human- and machine-written texts. Our findings reveal systematic grammatical differences between human- and machine-written texts, providing a reliable criterion for the determination of the text origin. We further examine the stability of this criterion in the context of AI humanization and translation to other languages.

InformationVol. 16(4)
Würth (Germany) (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Stiftung Würth
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.