Incidence and Outcomes of Upper GI Bleeding in Hospitalized SARS‐CoV‐2 Patients

<b>Background:</b> In March 2020, the severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) became a worldwide pandemic. Recently, it has been shown that direct entry of this virus in the gastrointestinal (GI) epithelial cells causes tissue damage and the use of anticoagulants increases the risk of GI bleeding. These pose real concerns for the gastroenterologists concerning the mortality, overall incidence, and management of upper GI bleeding in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study includes patients 18 years or older admitted to our health system with an upper GI bleed (UGB). Patients with possible UGB, endoscopy, and SARS-CoV-2-positive testing (<i>n</i> = 587) formed the initial cohort. In-depth data were collected for symptoms, medications, source of bleeding, and interventions for subsets of test and control subjects. <b>Results:</b> Duodenal ulcer was the most common etiology for GI bleeding in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, while esophagitis was the most common etiology in control subjects. SARS-CoV-2-positive patients had significant progressive anemia and had to be given more blood transfusions, steroids, proton pump inhibitors, and immunosuppressants. In-hospital mortality was greater in the experimental group (12.8%) than in the control group (5.1%). Furthermore, the SARS-CoV-2-positive patients had more therapeutic interventions compared to the SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. Nearly one-quarter of all patients had an endoscopy over 48 h after bleeding was observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> Healthcare providers should be aware of the greater therapeutic needs of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with UGB. Our data helps shed light on the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and GI bleeding due to SARS-CoV-2-related tissue damage and treatment affecting the GI tract.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/grp/4358786
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence and Outcomes of Upper GI Bleeding in Hospitalized SARS‐CoV‐2 Patients

Krystal Hunter, Katherine Gheysens, Sangita Phadtare, Adib Chaaya et al.
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Incidence and Outcomes of Upper GI Bleeding in Hospitalized SARS‐CoV‐2 Patients

Krystal Hunter, Katherine Gheysens, Sangita Phadtare, Adib Chaaya, Erin Sanzone
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> In March 2020, the severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) became a worldwide pandemic. Recently, it has been shown that direct entry of this virus in the gastrointestinal (GI) epithelial cells causes tissue damage and the use of anticoagulants increases the risk of GI bleeding. These pose real concerns for the gastroenterologists concerning the mortality, overall incidence, and management of upper GI bleeding in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study includes patients 18 years or older admitted to our health system with an upper GI bleed (UGB). Patients with possible UGB, endoscopy, and SARS-CoV-2-positive testing (<i>n</i> = 587) formed the initial cohort. In-depth data were collected for symptoms, medications, source of bleeding, and interventions for subsets of test and control subjects. <b>Results:</b> Duodenal ulcer was the most common etiology for GI bleeding in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, while esophagitis was the most common etiology in control subjects. SARS-CoV-2-positive patients had significant progressive anemia and had to be given more blood transfusions, steroids, proton pump inhibitors, and immunosuppressants. In-hospital mortality was greater in the experimental group (12.8%) than in the control group (5.1%). Furthermore, the SARS-CoV-2-positive patients had more therapeutic interventions compared to the SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. Nearly one-quarter of all patients had an endoscopy over 48 h after bleeding was observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> Healthcare providers should be aware of the greater therapeutic needs of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with UGB. Our data helps shed light on the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and GI bleeding due to SARS-CoV-2-related tissue damage and treatment affecting the GI tract.

Gastroenterology Research and PracticeVol. 2025(1)
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US), Virtua Health (US), Cooper University Health Care (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.